Showing results 5 to 15 of 15
< previous
| Issue Date | Title | Author(s) |
| 2012-01 | Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D | Ratcliffe, J; Flynn, TN; Terlich, FF; Stevens, K; Brazier, JE; Sawyer, M |
| 2019 | Developing UK values for cancer health states | Norman, R; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, D; Viney, R; King, MT |
| 2012-05-01 | The development of a QALY measure for epilepsy: NEWQOL-6D | Mulhern, B; Rowen, D; Jacoby, A; Marson, T; Snape, D; Hughes, D; Latimer, N; Baker, GA; Brazier, JE |
| 2017-08-01 | Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3) | Norman, R; Viney, R; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; Peacock, S; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, DJ; Velikova, G; Young, TA; King, MT |
| 2012-03-01 | Estimating preference-based single index measures for dementia using DEMQOL and DEMQOL-proxy | Rowen, D; Mulhern, B; Banerjee, S; Van Hout, B; Young, TA; Knapp, M; Smith, SC; Lamping, DL; Brazier, JE |
| 2022-07 | Estimation of a Canadian preference-based scoring algorithm for the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey: a population survey using a discrete-choice experiment. | Bansback, N; Trenaman, L; Mulhern, BJ; Norman, R; Metcalfe, R; Sawatzky, R; Brazier, JE; Rowen, D; Whitehurst, DGT |
| 2012-03-01 | Improving the measurement of QALYs in dementia: Developing patient- and carer-reported health state classification systems using Rasch analysis | Mulhern, B; Smith, SC; Rowen, D; Brazier, JE; Knapp, M; Lamping, DL; Loftus, V; Young, TA; Howard, RJ; Banerjee, S |
| 2021-06 | PNS111 Development of the SF-6DV2 Health Utility Survey: Content Validity and Patient Preference | Broderick, L; Bjorner, J; Lauher, M; Kosinski, M; White, MK; Mulhern, B; Brazier, JE |
| 2020-12 | The SF-6Dv2: How Does the New Classification System Impact the Distribution of Responses Compared with the Original SF-6D? | Whitehurst, DGT; Brazier, JE; Viney, R; Mulhern, BJ |
| 2019 | U.K. utility weights for the EORTC QLU‐C10D | Norman, R; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Rowen, D; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Pickard, AS; Street, DJ; Viney, R; King, MT |
| 2016-03-01 | Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format | Norman, R; Viney, R; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; Peacock, S; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, DJ; Velikova, G; Young, TA; King, MT |
