Browsing byAuthorKemmler, G

Jump to: 0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
or enter first few letters:  
Showing results 1 to 8 of 8
Issue DateTitleAuthor(s)
2018-02-01Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30King, MT; Viney, R; Simon Pickard, A; Rowen, D; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; McTaggart-Cowen, H; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Peacock, S; Street, DJ; Young, TA; Norman, R; Aaronson, N; Brazier, J; Costa, D; Fayers, P; Grimison, P; Janda, M; King (Chair), M; McTaggart-Cowan, H; Pickard, S; Velikova, G; Street, D; Young, T
2017-08-01Critical appraisal of health-state utility values used in breast cancer-related cost–utility analysesNerich, V; Saing, S; Gamper, EM; Holzner, B; Pivot, X; Viney, R; Kemmler, G
2017-08-01Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)Norman, R; Viney, R; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; Peacock, S; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, DJ; Velikova, G; Young, TA; King, MT
2021-07-03Estimation of an EORTC QLU-C10 Value Set for Spain Using a Discrete Choice ExperimentFinch, AP; Gamper, E; Norman, R; Viney, R; Holzner, B; King, M; Kemmler, G
-French Value-Set of the QLU-C10D, a Cancer-Specific Utility Measure Derived from the QLQ-C30Nerich, V; Gamper, EM; Norman, R; King, M; Holzner, B; Viney, R; Kemmler, G
2019-12-01German value sets for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a cancer-specific utility instrument based on the EORTC QLQ-C30Kemmler, G; Gamper, E; Nerich, V; Norman, R; Viney, R; Holzner, B; King, M
2018Test-retest reliability of discrete choice experiment for valuations of QLU-C10D health statesGamper, E; Kemmler, G; Holzner, B; Norman, R; King, M; Viney, RC
2016-03-01Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation formatNorman, R; Viney, R; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; Peacock, S; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, DJ; Velikova, G; Young, TA; King, MT