Browsing byAuthorNorman, R

Jump to: 0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
or enter first few letters:  
Showing results 16 to 35 of 71< previous   next >
Issue DateTitleAuthor(s)
2019-09-12Developing a cerebral palsy-specific preference-based measure for a six-dimensional classification system (CP-6D): protocol for a valuation study.Bahrampour, M; Norman, R; Byrnes, J; Downes, M; Scuffham, PA
2022-12-21Developing an Australian utility value set for MacNew-7D health states.Kularatna, S; Chen, G; Norman, R; Mukuria, C; Rowen, D; Senanayake, S; Hettiarachchi, R; Mulhern, B; Fozzard, K; Parsonage, W; MacPhail, SM
2019Developing UK values for cancer health statesNorman, R; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, D; Viney, R; King, MT
2020-09Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods.Bahrampour, M; Byrnes, J; Norman, R; Scuffham, PA; Downes, M
2010-05-01Does mode of administration matter? Comparison of online and face-to-face administration of a time trade-off taskNorman, R; King, MT; Clarke, D; Viney, R; Cronin, P; Street, D
2011-01An economic evaluation of community and residential aged care falls prevention strategies in NSWChurch, J; Goodall, S; Norman, R; Haas, MR
2011-06-01An economic evaluation of community and residential aged care falls prevention strategies in NSW.Church, J; Goodall, S; Norman, R; Haas, M
2009-02-01Economic evaluation of tandem mass spectrometry newborn screening in AustraliaNorman, R; Haas, M; Chaplin, M; Joy, P; Wilcken, B
2013-05-01Efficiency and equity: A stated preference approachNorman, R; Hall, J; Street, D; Viney, R
2019-01The EORTC QLU-C10D: The Canadian Valuation Study and Algorithm to Derive Cancer-Specific Utilities From the EORTC QLQ-C30.McTaggart-Cowan, H; King, MT; Norman, R; Costa, DSJ; Pickard, AS; Regier, DA; Viney, R; Peacock, SJ
2017-08-01Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)Norman, R; Viney, R; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; Peacock, S; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, DJ; Velikova, G; Young, TA; King, MT
2014-01-01Estimating health state utility values from discrete choice experiments - A QALY space model approachGu, Y; Norman, R; Viney, R
2022-07Estimation of a Canadian preference-based scoring algorithm for the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey: a population survey using a discrete-choice experiment.Bansback, N; Trenaman, L; Mulhern, BJ; Norman, R; Metcalfe, R; Sawatzky, R; Brazier, JE; Rowen, D; Whitehurst, DGT
2021-07-03Estimation of an EORTC QLU-C10 Value Set for Spain Using a Discrete Choice ExperimentFinch, AP; Gamper, E; Norman, R; Viney, R; Holzner, B; King, M; Kemmler, G
2021-06-28Evidence on the relationship between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D: a literature review.Pan, T; Mulhern, B; Viney, R; Norman, R; Tran-Duy, A; Hanmer, J; Devlin, N
2023-07-20Feasibility of self-reported health related quality of life assessment with older people in residential care: insights from the application of eye tracking technology.Milte, R; Crocker, M; Lay, K; Ratcliffe, J; Mulhern, B; Norman, R; Viney, R; Khadka, J
-French Value-Set of the QLU-C10D, a Cancer-Specific Utility Measure Derived from the QLQ-C30Nerich, V; Gamper, EM; Norman, R; King, M; Holzner, B; Viney, R; Kemmler, G
2019-12-01German value sets for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a cancer-specific utility instrument based on the EORTC QLQ-C30Kemmler, G; Gamper, E; Nerich, V; Norman, R; Viney, R; Holzner, B; King, M
2009-03How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria.Feder, G; Ramsay, J; Dunne, D; Rose, M; Arsene, C; Norman, R; Kuntze, S; Spencer, A; Bacchus, L; Hague, G; Warburton, A; Taket, A
2018-04-01How Should Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States?Mulhern, B; Norman, R; Shah, K; Bansback, N; Longworth, L; Viney, R