Browsing byAuthorNorman, R

Jump to: 0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
or enter first few letters:  
Showing results 24 to 43 of 71< previous   next >
Issue DateTitleAuthor(s)
2013-05-01Efficiency and equity: A stated preference approachNorman, R; Hall, J; Street, D; Viney, R
2019-01The EORTC QLU-C10D: The Canadian Valuation Study and Algorithm to Derive Cancer-Specific Utilities From the EORTC QLQ-C30.McTaggart-Cowan, H; King, MT; Norman, R; Costa, DSJ; Pickard, AS; Regier, DA; Viney, R; Peacock, SJ
2017-08-01Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)Norman, R; Viney, R; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; Peacock, S; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, DJ; Velikova, G; Young, TA; King, MT
2014-01-01Estimating health state utility values from discrete choice experiments - A QALY space model approachGu, Y; Norman, R; Viney, R
2022-07Estimation of a Canadian preference-based scoring algorithm for the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey: a population survey using a discrete-choice experiment.Bansback, N; Trenaman, L; Mulhern, BJ; Norman, R; Metcalfe, R; Sawatzky, R; Brazier, JE; Rowen, D; Whitehurst, DGT
2021-07-03Estimation of an EORTC QLU-C10 Value Set for Spain Using a Discrete Choice ExperimentFinch, AP; Gamper, E; Norman, R; Viney, R; Holzner, B; King, M; Kemmler, G
2021-06-28Evidence on the relationship between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D: a literature review.Pan, T; Mulhern, B; Viney, R; Norman, R; Tran-Duy, A; Hanmer, J; Devlin, N
2023-07-20Feasibility of self-reported health related quality of life assessment with older people in residential care: insights from the application of eye tracking technology.Milte, R; Crocker, M; Lay, K; Ratcliffe, J; Mulhern, B; Norman, R; Viney, R; Khadka, J
-French Value-Set of the QLU-C10D, a Cancer-Specific Utility Measure Derived from the QLQ-C30Nerich, V; Gamper, EM; Norman, R; King, M; Holzner, B; Viney, R; Kemmler, G
2019-12-01German value sets for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a cancer-specific utility instrument based on the EORTC QLQ-C30Kemmler, G; Gamper, E; Nerich, V; Norman, R; Viney, R; Holzner, B; King, M
2009-03How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria.Feder, G; Ramsay, J; Dunne, D; Rose, M; Arsene, C; Norman, R; Kuntze, S; Spencer, A; Bacchus, L; Hague, G; Warburton, A; Taket, A
2018-04-01How Should Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States?Mulhern, B; Norman, R; Shah, K; Bansback, N; Longworth, L; Viney, R
2016-08-01The Impact of Different DCE-Based Approaches When Anchoring Utility ScoresNorman, R; Mulhern, B; Viney, R
2012-10-01Implementing Person-Centered Care in Residential Dementia CareStein-Parbury, J; Chenoweth, L; Jeon, YH; Brodaty, H; Haas, M; Norman, R
2009-01-01International comparisons in valuing eq-5d health states: A review and analysisNorman, R; Cronin, P; Viney, R; King, M; Street, D; Ratcliffe, J
2009-03-01International perspectives on the cost-effectiveness of tandem mass spectrometry for rare metabolic conditionsNorman, R; Haas, M; Wilcken, B
2011-10-01Introduction and uptake of new medical technologies in the Australian health care system: A qualitative studyGallego, G; Casey, R; Norman, R; Goodall, S
2019Investigating the relative value of health and social care related quality of life using a discrete choice experimentMulhern, B; Norman, R; De Abreu Lourenco, R; Street, D; Malley, J; Viney, R
2017-04-01Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?Mulhern, B; Norman, R; Lorgelly, P; Lancsar, E; Ratcliffe, J; Brazier, J; Viney, R
2019-06-01Issues in the Design of Discrete Choice ExperimentsNorman, R; Craig, BM; Hansen, P; Jonker, MF; Rose, J; Street, DJ; Mulhern, B