Browsing by Author Norman, R

0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Showing results 15 to 34 of 40< previous   next >
Issue DateTitleAuthor(s)
Jan-2011An economic evaluation of community and residential aged care falls prevention strategies in NSWChurch, J; Goodall, S; Norman, R; Haas, MR
1-Jun-2011An economic evaluation of community and residential aged care falls prevention strategies in NSW.Church, J; Goodall, S; Norman, R; Haas, M
1-Feb-2009Economic evaluation of tandem mass spectrometry newborn screening in AustraliaNorman, R; Haas, M; Chaplin, M; Joy, P; Wilcken, B
1-May-2013Efficiency and equity: A stated preference approachNorman, R; Hall, J; Street, D; Viney, R
Jan-2019The EORTC QLU-C10D: The Canadian Valuation Study and Algorithm to Derive Cancer-Specific Utilities From the EORTC QLQ-C30.McTaggart-Cowan, H; King, MT; Norman, R; Costa, DSJ; Pickard, AS; Regier, DA; Viney, R; Peacock, SJ
1-Aug-2017Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)Norman, R; Viney, R; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; Peacock, S; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, DJ; Velikova, G; Young, TA; King, MT
1-Jan-2014Estimating health state utility values from discrete choice experiments - A QALY space model approachGu, Y; Norman, R; Viney, R
Mar-2009How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria.Feder, G; Ramsay, J; Dunne, D; Rose, M; Arsene, C; Norman, R; Kuntze, S; Spencer, A; Bacchus, L; Hague, G; Warburton, A; Taket, A
1-Apr-2018How Should Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States?Mulhern, B; Norman, R; Shah, K; Bansback, N; Longworth, L; Viney, R
1-Aug-2016The Impact of Different DCE-Based Approaches When Anchoring Utility ScoresNorman, R; Mulhern, B; Viney, R
1-Oct-2012Implementing Person-Centered Care in Residential Dementia CareStein-Parbury, J; Chenoweth, L; Jeon, YH; Brodaty, H; Haas, M; Norman, R
1-Jan-2009International comparisons in valuing eq-5d health states: A review and analysisNorman, R; Cronin, P; Viney, R; King, M; Street, D; Ratcliffe, J
1-Mar-2009International perspectives on the cost-effectiveness of tandem mass spectrometry for rare metabolic conditionsNorman, R; Haas, M; Wilcken, B
1-Oct-2011Introduction and uptake of new medical technologies in the Australian health care system: A qualitative studyGallego, G; Casey, R; Norman, R; Goodall, S
2019Investigating the relative value of health and social care related quality of life using a discrete choice experimentMulhern, B; Norman, R; De Abreu Lourenco, R; Street, D; Malley, J; Viney, R
1-Apr-2017Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?Mulhern, B; Norman, R; Lorgelly, P; Lancsar, E; Ratcliffe, J; Brazier, J; Viney, R
1-Jun-2019Issues in the Design of Discrete Choice ExperimentsNorman, R; Craig, BM; Hansen, P; Jonker, MF; Rose, J; Street, DJ; Mulhern, B
1-Apr-2013Measuring the loss of consumer choice in mandatory health programmes using discrete choice experimentsParkinson, B; Goodall, S; Norman, R
1-Jun-2013A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health statesNorman, R; Cronin, P; Viney, R
1-May-2012Preferences for cancer treatments: An overview of methods and applications in oncologyBlinman, P; King, M; Norman, R; Viney, R; Stockler, MR