Browsing by Author Street, D

Showing results 1 to 20 of 24  next >
Issue DateTitleAuthor(s)
1-Feb-2018Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30King, MT; Viney, R; Simon Pickard, A; Rowen, D; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; McTaggart-Cowen, H; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Peacock, S; Street, DJ; Young, TA; Norman, R; Aaronson, N; Brazier, J; Cella, D; Costa, D; Fayers, P; Grimison, P; Janda, M; Kemmler, G; KingĀ (Chair), M; McTaggart-Cowan, H; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Norman, R; Pickard, S; Rowen, D; Velikova, G; Viney, R; Street, D; Young, T
2015Complexity and doctor choices when discussing contraceptivesFiebig, D; Viney, RC; Haas, M; Knox, S; Street, D; Weisberg, E; Bateson, D
1-Jan-2014An Australian discrete choice experiment to value EQ-5D health statesViney, R; Norman, R; Brazier, J; Cronin, P; King, MT; Ratcliffe, J; Street, D
1-Jun-2013Do women and providers value the same features of contraceptive products? Results of a best-worst stated preference experimentWeisberg, E; Bateson, D; Knox, S; Haas, M; Viney, R; Street, D; Fiebig, D
1-May-2013Efficiency and equity: A stated preference approachNorman, R; Hall, J; Street, D; Viney, R
14-Feb-2012Survival gains needed to offset persistent adverse treatment effects in localised prostate cancerKing, MT; Viney, R; Smith, DP; Hossain, I; Street, D; Savage, E; Fowler, S; Berry, MP; Stockler, M; Cozzi, P; Stricker, P; Ward, J; Armstrong, BK
Jan-2012What's good and bad about contraceptive products? A best-worst attribute experiment comparing the values of women consumers and GPsKnox, SA; Viney, RC; Street, D; Haas, MR; Fiebig, DG; Weisberg, E; Bateson, D
Jan-2012Designing for Attribute-Level Best-Worst Choice ExperimentsStreet, D; Knox, SA
Jan-2011Comparing designs for choice experiments: A case studyBurgess, LB; Street, D; Wasi, N
1-Jul-2010Optimal designs for stated choice experiments that incorporate tiesBush, S; Burgess, L; Street, D
1-May-2010Does mode of administration matter? Comparison of online and face-to-face administration of a time trade-off taskNorman, R; King, MT; Clarke, D; Viney, R; Cronin, P; Street, D
1-Jan-2009International comparisons in valuing eq-5d health states: A review and analysisNorman, R; Cronin, P; Viney, R; King, M; Street, D; Ratcliffe, J
1-Aug-2008Designing discrete choice experiments: Do optimal designs come at a price?Louviere, JJ; Islam, T; Wasi, N; Street, D; Burgess, L
1-Apr-2008Is fast access to general practice all that should matter? A discrete choice experiment of patients' preferencesGerard, K; Salisbury, C; Street, D; Pope, C; Baxter, H
1-Jan-2008Modeling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference informationLouviere, JJ; Street, D; Burgess, L; Wasi, N; Islam, T; Marley, AAJ
Jan-2008Some open combinatorial problems in the design of stated choice experimentsStreet, D; Burgess, LB
Jan-2008Designing Discrete Choice Experiments for Health CareStreet, D; Burgess, LB; Viney, RC; Louviere, JJ; Ryan, M; Gerard, K; Amaya-Amaya, M
Jan-2006Design of choice experiments in health economicsBurgess, LB; Street, D; Viney, RC; Louviere, JJ; Jones, AM
Jan-2004Optimal and near-optimal pairs for the estimation of effects in 2-levels choice experimentsStreet, D; Burgess, LB
1-Aug-2002Dissecting the random component of utilityLouviere, J; Street, D; Carson, R; Ainslie, A; Deshazo, JR; Cameron, TA; Hensher, D; Kohn, R; Marley, T