Showing results 1 to 20 of 28
next >
| Issue Date | Title | Author(s) |
| 2023-04 | The Use of a Discrete Choice Experiment Including Both Duration and Dead for the Development of an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Australia. | Norman, R; Mulhern, B; Lancsar, E; Lorgelly, P; Ratcliffe, J; Street, D; Viney, R |
| 2022-12-23 | EE545 Mapping Between Health and Broader Quality of Life Instruments: A Scoping Review | Akanksha, A; Viney, R; Mulhern, B; Street, D |
| 2022-11-21 | Responses to direct-to-consumer advertising in Australia: Comparing experience | Goodall, S; Viney, R; Street, D; Waller, D; Zhao, FL |
| 2022-01-01 | Men's preferences for image-guidance in prostate radiation therapy: A discrete choice experiment. | Brown, A; Pain, T; Tan, A; Anable, L; Callander, E; Watt, K; Street, D; De Abreu Lourenco, R |
| 2022-01 | POSA352 The Preferences of Australian Women for the Outcomes of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) | Church, J; Street, D; Bateson, D; Haas, M |
| 2021-11 | Clinical assessment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a discrete choice experiment of patient preferences. | Yu, A; Street, D; Viney, R; Goodall, S; Pearce, A; Haywood, P; Haas, M; Battaglini, E; Goldstein, D; Timmins, H; Park, SB |
| 2021-03-11 | Exploring the Trade-Off Between Economic and Health Outcomes During a Pandemic: A Discrete Choice Experiment of Lockdown Policies in Australia | Manipis, K; Street, D; Cronin, P; Viney, R; Goodall, S |
| 2020 | An Introduction to the Construction of Discrete Choice Experiments | Street, D |
| 2019 | Design of Discrete Choice Experiments | Street, D; Viney, R |
| 2019 | Developing UK values for cancer health states | Norman, R; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, D; Viney, R; King, MT |
| 2019 | Investigating the relative value of health and social care related quality of life using a discrete choice experiment | Mulhern, B; Norman, R; De Abreu Lourenco, R; Street, D; Malley, J; Viney, R |
| 2018-02-01 | Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30 | King, MT; Viney, R; Simon Pickard, A; Rowen, D; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; McTaggart-Cowen, H; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Peacock, S; Street, DJ; Young, TA; Norman, R; Aaronson, N; Brazier, J; Costa, D; Fayers, P; Grimison, P; Janda, M; King (Chair), M; McTaggart-Cowan, H; Pickard, S; Velikova, G; Street, D; Young, T |
| 2015 | Complexity and doctor choices when discussing contraceptives | Fiebig, D; Viney, RC; Haas, M; Knox, S; Street, D; Weisberg, E; Bateson, D |
| 2014-01-01 | An Australian discrete choice experiment to value EQ-5D health states | Viney, R; Norman, R; Brazier, J; Cronin, P; King, MT; Ratcliffe, J; Street, D |
| 2013-06-01 | Do women and providers value the same features of contraceptive products? Results of a best-worst stated preference experiment | Weisberg, E; Bateson, D; Knox, S; Haas, M; Viney, R; Street, D; Fiebig, D |
| 2013-05-01 | Efficiency and equity: A stated preference approach | Norman, R; Hall, J; Street, D; Viney, R |
| 2012-02-14 | Survival gains needed to offset persistent adverse treatment effects in localised prostate cancer | King, MT; Viney, R; Smith, DP; Hossain, I; Street, D; Savage, E; Fowler, S; Berry, MP; Stockler, M; Cozzi, P; Stricker, P; Ward, J; Armstrong, BK |
| 2012-01 | What's good and bad about contraceptive products? A best-worst attribute experiment comparing the values of women consumers and GPs | Knox, SA; Viney, RC; Street, D; Haas, MR; Fiebig, DG; Weisberg, E; Bateson, D |
| 2010-07-01 | Optimal designs for stated choice experiments that incorporate ties | Bush, S; Burgess, L; Street, D |
| 2010-05-01 | Does mode of administration matter? Comparison of online and face-to-face administration of a time trade-off task | Norman, R; King, MT; Clarke, D; Viney, R; Cronin, P; Street, D |
