<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/35222">
    <title>OPUS Community:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/35222</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/188088" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/187901" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/187881" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/187731" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-10T22:02:17Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/188088">
    <title>Sexuality and Intimacy</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/188088</link>
    <description>Title: Sexuality and Intimacy
Authors: Power, E; McGrath, M; Lever, S</description>
    <dc:date>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/187901">
    <title>"How well do we know our patients?": Further validation of a complexity rating scale for HIV.</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/187901</link>
    <description>Title: "How well do we know our patients?": Further validation of a complexity rating scale for HIV.
Authors: Begley, K; Smith, D; Wand, H; Chan, D; Furner, V; Kelly, ML; McGrath, P; Hennessy, R; Price, A; Purnomo, L; Bowden, BH; Bulsara, SM
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the management and treatment of HIV, identifying risks for disengagement are essential to maximize positive outcomes. The current study investigated the validity of the Clinical Complexity Rating Scale for HIV (CCRS-HIV), a risk-prediction tool, by assessing agreement between patient and clinician scores of patient complexity. METHODS: 207 patients completed the patient version of the CCRS-HIV (CCRS-HIVP), and six Attending Medical Officers (AMOs) caring for those individuals completed the original clinician version (CCRS-HIVC). Kappa statistics, sensitivity and specificity were used to assess patient-clinician agreement. RESULTS: Patient-clinician agreement was highest for problematic crystal methamphetamine use (86%), polypharmacy (84%) and other physical health concerns (67%). Cut-offs of 40 and 45 for the total CCRS-HIV score were identified as most appropriate, with high sensitivity (79.31% and 76.0% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Overall agreement between the clinician and patient complexity scores was high. These findings provide further evidence of the validity of the scale. The study demonstrates that the unique role of AMOs at the center contributes to them knowing their patients well, allowing them to manage and refer when required for interdisciplinary care which likely contributes to their ongoing engagement in care and may account for the high level of agreement.</description>
    <dc:date>2024-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/187881">
    <title>Credibility, readability and content analysis of treatment recommendations for adolescents with nonspecific back pain published on consumer websites.</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/187881</link>
    <description>Title: Credibility, readability and content analysis of treatment recommendations for adolescents with nonspecific back pain published on consumer websites.
Authors: Hauber, SD; Robinson, K; Fechner, R; Pate, JW; O'Sullivan, K
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Parents may seek out health information online when their adolescent has nonspecific back pain to better understand treatment options. Such information directed towards consumers has not been previously analysed. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional content analysis was performed to describe the treatments recommended on consumer websites for nonspecific back pain in adolescents. The credibility and readability of the websites were also assessed. Systematic Google searches were completed in five countries, and relevant content from eligible web pages was analysed. An a priori codebook with 34 treatment-related codes was developed. Nine additional codes were inductively created during analysis. Credibility was assessed using the JAMA benchmark. Readability was assessed via the Flesch Kincaid Grade Level. RESULTS: Of 245 web pages, 48 were deemed eligible and analysed. Of 43 treatment codes, 37 were present in at least one web page. The five most frequently identified codes were See the doctor/get a diagnosis (found on 85% of web pages), Ergonomics/posture/biomechanics (52%), Reassurance (48%), Physiotherapy (48%) and Non-prescription pharmaceuticals/supplements (46%). Only 21% of the web pages met all four JAMA benchmark criteria, and 15% cited at least one recent or high-quality source. The median Flesch Kincaid Grade Level score was 9.0 (range 3.5-12.9). CONCLUSIONS: Parents of adolescents with nonspecific back pain may find that treatment recommendations published online are numerous and varied, with visits to the doctor encouraged. The credibility scores of these web pages are generally low, while the median reading level may be too high for the general population. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This analysis reveals that public-facing websites with recommendations for treating adolescent nonspecific back pain do not cite the most recent, high-quality research. Although web pages correctly encourage physical activity and exercise over surgery and prescription medications, they do not reflect the psychologically informed or interdisciplinary care emphasized in recently published treatment recommendations. Clinicians must be aware that caregivers of their adolescent patients with nonspecific back pain may be exposed to online messages that encourage them to keep seeking a diagnosis.</description>
    <dc:date>2024-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/187731">
    <title>Predictors of outcome in self-guided internet-delivered cognitive-behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A preliminary investigation.</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/187731</link>
    <description>Title: Predictors of outcome in self-guided internet-delivered cognitive-behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A preliminary investigation.
Authors: Wootton, BM; McDonald, S; Karin, E; Titov, N; Dear, BF
Abstract: Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (ICBT) is an effective treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). ICBT can be delivered in a self-guided or clinician-guided format. While a literature is emerging on the predictors of response to clinician-guided ICBT, there is a lack of research examining the predictors of response to self-guided ICBT. The aim of the present study was to examine predictors of outcome in a large sample of participants with OCD who commenced a self-guided ICBT intervention. One hundred and fifty-seven participants (Mage = 34.82; SD = 10.49; 78% female) were included in the study. Regression analyses were conducted to determine clinical and demographic predictors of (1) posttreatment symptom severity and (2) a clinically meaningful treatment response for both the intention-to-treat (ITT) and completer samples. The regression models significantly predicted posttreatment outcome for both the ITT (F(8, 148) = 15.844, p &lt; .001) and completer sample (F(8, 101) = 5.929, p &lt; .001), explaining 46% and 34% of the variance respectively. Higher baseline OCD severity, younger age, experiencing higher contamination or symmetry symptoms, and a history of past treatment were all found to be significantly associated with higher posttreatment severity in the ITT sample. In the completer sample only higher baseline OCD severity and severity of harm-related obsessions and checking compulsions was significantly associated with higher posttreatment severity. When predicting treatment response the regression models for both the ITT and completer sample were nonsignificant.</description>
    <dc:date>2024-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

