Detoxification, Displacement and Deferral. The Democratic Failures of GM Regulation

Griffith University
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Griffith Law Review, 2009, 2009, 18 (3), pp. 752 - 777
Issue Date:
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description SizeFormat
2009005316OK.pdf392.83 kBAdobe PDF
The implied promise of liberal democracies in a state of pluralism is that difference will be addressed. This article argues that this promise has not been met in the case of GM regulation, despite 30 years of discussion and debate. Rather than attribute this failure to the insurmountable logic of uncertainty, this article blames it on the strategies of detoxification, displacement and deferral employed by the legislature and the Gene Technology Regulator to avoid addressing substantive issues of social meaning in relation to GM technology. The article concludes that the Gene Technology Regulator has failed to fulfil the broad legislative mandate granted under the Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth), thereby rendering the Regulator's position largely irrelevant.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: