"It's the Same Old Song": Draconian Counter-Terrorism Laws and the Deja Vu of Indigenous Australians

Watson, N; Davis, MJ

"It's the Same Old Song": Draconian Counter-Terrorism Laws and the Deja Vu of Indigenous Australians

Watson, N Davis, MJ

Permalink

Publisher:: School of Politics and International Relations, University of New South Wales
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Borderlands E-Journal, 2006, 5 (1), pp. 1 - 8
Issue Date:: 2006-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (66.7 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Watson, N	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Davis, MJ	en_US
dc.date.issued	2006-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Borderlands E-Journal, 2006, 5 (1), pp. 1 - 8	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1447-0810	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/1551
dc.description.abstract	Over the course of the past four years, the Australian government's legislative response to the terrorist attacks in New York 11 September 2001 has been controversial. Central to the legislative response package has been the Security Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2002 (Cth) and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2003 (Cth) which has been scrutinised by many sectors of the Australian community for the way in which it impinges upon the fundamental human rights of all Australians such as freedom of speech, freedom of movement and freedom of association.	en_US
dc.publisher	School of Politics and International Relations, University of New South Wales	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Borderlands E-Journal	en_US
dc.title	"It's the Same Old Song": Draconian Counter-Terrorism Laws and the Deja Vu of Indigenous Australians	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	1	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	5	en_US
utslib.for	2102 Curatorial and Related Studies	en_US
utslib.for	21 History and Archaeology	en_US
utslib.for	20 Language, Communication and Culture	en_US
utslib.for	16 Studies in Human Society	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Research)
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences/School of Communication
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Provost
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Provost/Jumbunna
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.issue	1	en_US
pubs.volume	5	en_US

Abstract:

Over the course of the past four years, the Australian government's legislative response to the terrorist attacks in New York 11 September 2001 has been controversial. Central to the legislative response package has been the Security Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2002 (Cth) and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2003 (Cth) which has been scrutinised by many sectors of the Australian community for the way in which it impinges upon the fundamental human rights of all Australians such as freedom of speech, freedom of movement and freedom of association.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/1551