Factors Causing Variation in World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist Effectiveness-A Rapid Scoping Review

Wani, MM; Gilbert, JHV; Mohammed, CA; Madaan, S

Factors Causing Variation in World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist Effectiveness-A Rapid Scoping Review

Wani, MM Gilbert, JHV Mohammed, CA Madaan, S

Permalink

Publisher:: Wolters Kluwer
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: J Patient Saf, 2022, 18, (8), pp. e1150-e1159
Issue Date:: 2022-12-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	Factors Causing Variation in World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist Effectiveness—A Rapid Scoping Review.pdf		573.02 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Wani, MM
dc.contributor.author	Gilbert, JHV
dc.contributor.author	Mohammed, CA
dc.contributor.author	Madaan, S
dc.date.accessioned	2023-05-24T01:45:42Z
dc.date.available	2023-05-24T01:45:42Z
dc.date.issued	2022-12-01
dc.identifier.citation	J Patient Saf, 2022, 18, (8), pp. e1150-e1159
dc.identifier.issn	1549-8417
dc.identifier.issn	1549-8425
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/170425
dc.description.abstract	Introduction This review was conducted to determine what factors might be responsible for prejudicing the outcomes after the implementation of a World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist WHO SSC grouping them appropriately and proposing strategies that enable the SSC a more helpful and productive tool in the operating room Methods It was a rapid scoping review conducted as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta analyses extension guidelines for scoping reviews PRISMA Scr Comprehensive search on MEDLINE and Embase was carried out to include all relevant studies published during last 5 years Twenty seven studies were included in analysis The barriers to SSC implementation were classified into 5 main groups with further subdivisions in each Results The results of review revealed that there are 5 major barriers to SSC at the following levels organizational checklist individual technical and implementation Each of these major barriers on further evaluation was found to have more than one contributing factors All these factors were analyzed individually Conclusions This rapid scoping review has consolidated data which may pave the way for experts to further examine steps that might be taken locally or globally in order that the WHO SSC to successfully achieve all its desired goals Wolters Kluwer Health Inc All rights reserved
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	Wolters Kluwer
dc.relation.ispartof	J Patient Saf
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1097/PTS.0000000000001035
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject	1117 Public Health and Health Services
dc.subject.classification	Health Policy & Services
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Checklist
dc.subject.mesh	Operating Rooms
dc.subject.mesh	World Health Organization
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Checklist
dc.subject.mesh	Operating Rooms
dc.subject.mesh	World Health Organization
dc.title	Factors Causing Variation in World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist Effectiveness-A Rapid Scoping Review
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	18
utslib.location.activity	United States
utslib.for	1117 Public Health and Health Services
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access	*
dc.date.updated	2023-05-24T01:45:39Z
pubs.issue	8
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	18
utslib.citation.issue	8

Abstract:

Introduction This review was conducted to determine what factors might be responsible for prejudicing the outcomes after the implementation of a World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist WHO SSC grouping them appropriately and proposing strategies that enable the SSC a more helpful and productive tool in the operating room Methods It was a rapid scoping review conducted as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta analyses extension guidelines for scoping reviews PRISMA Scr Comprehensive search on MEDLINE and Embase was carried out to include all relevant studies published during last 5 years Twenty seven studies were included in analysis The barriers to SSC implementation were classified into 5 main groups with further subdivisions in each Results The results of review revealed that there are 5 major barriers to SSC at the following levels organizational checklist individual technical and implementation Each of these major barriers on further evaluation was found to have more than one contributing factors All these factors were analyzed individually Conclusions This rapid scoping review has consolidated data which may pave the way for experts to further examine steps that might be taken locally or globally in order that the WHO SSC to successfully achieve all its desired goals Wolters Kluwer Health Inc All rights reserved

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/170425