Relative age effects in Australian junior rugby union
- Publication Type:
- Thesis
- Issue Date:
- 2012
Open Access
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is open access.
Each of the four codes of professional football played in Australia (i.e., Rugby Union, Rugby
League, Australian Rules Football and Soccer) is faced with the dilemma of identifying and
developing talented young athletes into elite senior players. One of the key difficulties faced
by talent scouts, coaches and selectors is identifying talented young individuals during
adolescence. Individual differences in the timing and tempo of the maturation process, which
are most visible during puberty, can have a significant impact on all aspects of sporting
performance and resultant judgements of talented players. With junior and youth teams
organised according to chronological age-groupings, inequalities related to perceptions of
playing ability are likely to emerge between individuals based on when in a calendar year they
are born. These inequalities have become known as ‘Relative Age Effects’, with young
players born earlier in a selection year gaining advantages over their later-born counterparts.
These advantages include more playing time, a perception of possessing more talent and a
subsequent increase in the probability of gaining selection in elite representative teams.
The purpose of the first part of this investigation was to examine whether a relative age effect
was present in a cohort of elite junior rugby union players competing at the annual national
U16 championships. Individual birth-date data and playing position was recorded for each
participant at the championships over a seven-year period (2004 – 2010). Chi-square statistics
were used to examine differences between observed and expected birth date distributions in
all players and general playing positions (forwards and backs). Comparison of birth date
distributions between players in the 1st (top 8 teams) and 2nd division (bottom 4 teams) was
also conducted. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also calculated
for both quartile and half-year distributions (H1 and H2). For the OR analyses, the relatively
youngest members, (i.e. quartile 4 and H2 respectively) of the annual age-groupings were
assigned as referent groups.
The second part of the investigation examined whether increasing age and skill levels would
act as moderators of relative age effects in talented Australian rugby union players.
Individual birth-date data was obtained for Australian U20 teams from 2008 to 2011. Birthdate
distributions for this group were then compared to distributions from the U16 national
championships for the equivalent time period (i.e. 2004 - 2007). Chi-square statistics were
again used to examine differences between observed and expected birth date distributions in
all players to determine the size of the relative age effect in the U20’s teams and to the
compare these results with those from the U16 group. ORs and CIs were also calculated for
both quartile and half-year distributions (H1 and H2). For the OR analyses, the relatively
youngest members, (i.e. quartile 4 and H2, respectively) of the annual age-groupings were
assigned as referent groups. Player retention along the development pathway was also
examined, with selection to Australian schoolboys teams observed as the intermediate step
from U16 championships to the Australian U20 team.
The main finding from the first part of the investigation was the presence of a strong relative
age effect within the cohort of elite junior rugby union players. The birth-date distribution
was significantly biased towards a higher number of births earlier in the selection year. There
was also a significant underrepresentation from players born in the fourth quarter of the year.
This study also found that birth date distributions were influenced by age and skill level, but
not playing position. A stronger age bias was observed for players from the division one
teams competing at the U16 championships, with a larger disparity between players born in
the first and last quarters of the selection year than in division two. Playing position did not
appear to impact on the birth date distribution. Even though there was a strong
overrepresentation of players born in the first half of the year for both forward and backline
playing positions, the percentage breakdown for each group were similar. The second part of
the investigation showed there was a strong retention of players along the developmental
pathway from the U16 age group through to the Australian U20 Junior World Cup team.
These findings suggest that increasing age does not appear to act as a moderator of relative
age effects in talented Australian rugby union players.
In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrated the presence of a strong relative age
effect in a group of elite U16 rugby players. This biased birth date distribution also appeared
along the developmental pathway until the Australian U20 team. On the basis of these
findings, it is recommended that current selection processes require modification to assist with
minimising and/or eliminating the various factors that have led to their development in elite
junior rugby union teams.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: