| Issue Date | Title | Author(s) |
| 2015-05-01 | DIRECTLY ELICITING PERSONAL UTILITY FUNCTIONS: A NEW WAY TO VALUE HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE | Shah, K; Devlin, N; Mulhern, B; van Hout, B |
| 2018-06-01 | Correction to: Comparing the UK EQ-5D-3L and English EQ-5D-5L Value Sets (PharmacoEconomics, (2018), 36, 6, (699-713), 10.1007/s40273-018-0628-3) | Mulhern, B; Feng, Y; Shah, K; Janssen, MF; Herdman, M; van Hout, B; Devlin, N |
| 2019-07-01 | Cultural Values: Can They Explain Differences in Health Utilities between Countries? | Roudijk, B; Donders, ART; Stalmeier, PFM; Luo, N; Viney, R; Andrade, MV; Gudex, C; de Pouvourville, G; Greiner, W; Scalone, L; Tsuchiya, A; Golicki, D; Ferreira, P; Prevolnik-Rupel, V; Badia, X; Hsieh, CL; Jelsma, J; Santos, M; Xie, F; Purba, F; Ikeda, S; Shiroiwa, T; Stolk, E; Jo, MW; Ramos-Goñi, JM; Augustovski, F; Rey-Ares, L; Devlin, N; Shah, K; Pattanaphesaj, J; Tongsiri, S |
| 2018-04-01 | How Should Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States? | Mulhern, B; Norman, R; Shah, K; Bansback, N; Longworth, L; Viney, R |
| 2018-06-01 | Comparing the UK EQ-5D-3L and English EQ-5D-5L Value Sets | Mulhern, B; Feng, Y; Shah, K; Janssen, MF; Herdman, M; van Hout, B; Devlin, N |
| 2020 | The EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England: Response to the “Quality Assurance” | van Hout, B; Mulhern, B; Feng, Y; Shah, K; Devlin, N |
| 2016-01-01 | An empirical study of two alternative comparators for use in time trade-off studies | Shah, K; Mulhern, B; Longworth, L; Janssen, MF |
| 2018-05-01 | Valuing EQ-5D-5L health states ‘in context’ using a discrete choice experiment | Cole, A; Shah, K; Mulhern, B; Feng, Y; Devlin, N |
