Search

Current filters:
Add Filter:

Results

Customise results display
Item hits:
Issue DateTitleAuthor(s)
27-Feb-2013Development of DEMQOL-U and DEMQOL-PROXY-U: Generation of preference-based indices from DEMQOL and DEMQOL-PROXY for use in economic evaluationMulhern, B; Rowen, D; Brazier, J; Smith, S; Romeo, R; Tait, R; Watchurst, C; Chua, KC; Loftus, V; Young, T; Lamping, D; Knapp, M; Howard, R; Banerjee, S
1-Jan-2013Binary choice health state valuation and mode of administration: Head-to-head comparison of online and CAPIMulhern, B; Longworth, L; Brazier, J; Rowen, D; Bansback, N; Devlin, N; Tsuchiya, A
1-Feb-2014Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: A systematic review, statistical modelling and surveyLongworth, L; Yang, Y; Young, T; Mulhern, B; Hernández Alava, M; Mukuria, C; Rowen, D; Tosh, J; Tsuchiya, A; Evans, P; Devianee Keetharuth, A; Brazier, J
1-Feb-2018Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30King, MT; Viney, R; Simon Pickard, A; Rowen, D; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; McTaggart-Cowen, H; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Peacock, S; Street, DJ; Young, TA; Norman, R; Aaronson, N; Brazier, J; Cella, D; Costa, D; Fayers, P; Grimison, P; Janda, M; King (Chair), M; McTaggart-Cowan, H; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Norman, R; Pickard, S; Velikova, G; Street, D; Young, T
1-Jan-2018Using a Discrete-Choice Experiment Involving Cost to Value a Classification System Measuring the Quality-of-Life Impact of Self-Management for DiabetesRowen, D; Stevens, K; Labeit, A; Elliott, J; Mulhern, B; Carlton, J; Basarir, H; Ratcliffe, J; Brazier, J
1-Aug-2018Estimating a Preference-Based Single Index Measuring the Quality-of-Life Impact of Self-Management for DiabetesRowen, D; Labeit, A; Stevens, K; Elliott, J; Mulhern, B; Carlton, J; Basarir, H; Brazier, J
1-Mar-2016Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation formatNorman, R; Viney, R; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; Peacock, S; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, DJ; Velikova, G; Young, TA; King, MT
1-Aug-2017Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)Norman, R; Viney, R; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; Peacock, S; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, DJ; Velikova, G; Young, TA; King, MT
2019U.K. utility weights for the EORTC QLU‐C10DNorman, R; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Rowen, D; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Pickard, AS; Street, DJ; Viney, R; King, MT
2019Developing UK values for cancer health statesNorman, R; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, D; Viney, R; King, MT
Results 11-20 of 20 (Search time: 0.049 seconds).