Issue Date | Title | Author(s) |
2012-02-14 | Survival gains needed to offset persistent adverse treatment effects in localised prostate cancer | King, MT; Viney, R; Smith, DP; Hossain, I; Street, D; Savage, E; Fowler, S; Berry, MP; Stockler, M; Cozzi, P; Stricker, P; Ward, J; Armstrong, BK |
2012-01 | What's good and bad about contraceptive products? A best-worst attribute experiment comparing the values of women consumers and GPs | Knox, SA; Viney, RC; Street, D; Haas, MR; Fiebig, DG; Weisberg, E; Bateson, D |
2019 | Design of Discrete Choice Experiments | Street, D; Viney, R |
2009-01-01 | International comparisons in valuing eq-5d health states: A review and analysis | Norman, R; Cronin, P; Viney, R; King, M; Street, D; Ratcliffe, J |
2002-12-01 | Dissecting the Random Component of Utility | Louviere, J; Street, D; Carson, R; Ainslie, A; Deshazo, JR; Cameron, T; Hensher, D; Kohn, R; Marley, T |
2018-02-01 | Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30 | King, MT; Viney, R; Simon Pickard, A; Rowen, D; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; McTaggart-Cowen, H; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Peacock, S; Street, DJ; Young, TA; Norman, R; Aaronson, N; Brazier, J; Costa, D; Fayers, P; Grimison, P; Janda, M; King (Chair), M; McTaggart-Cowan, H; Pickard, S; Velikova, G; Street, D; Young, T |
2014-01-01 | An Australian discrete choice experiment to value EQ-5D health states | Viney, R; Norman, R; Brazier, J; Cronin, P; King, MT; Ratcliffe, J; Street, D |
2019 | Developing UK values for cancer health states | Norman, R; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, D; Viney, R; King, MT |
2013-05-01 | Efficiency and equity: A stated preference approach | Norman, R; Hall, J; Street, D; Viney, R |
2020 | An Introduction to the Construction of Discrete Choice Experiments | Street, D |