The Medical Record As Organising Discourse

Publisher:
John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Document Design: journal of research and problem solving in organizational communication, 2003, 4 (1), pp. 64 - 84
Issue Date:
2003-01
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2006010108.pdf250.19 kB
Adobe PDF
This paper analyzes different manifestations of the medical record in order to demonstrate how and why some discourse creates greater organizational reach. In doing so, the paper presents four arguments. First, that types of discourse research that analyze organization from the perspective of regularized practices on the one hand, and those which frame organization as narrative and story-telling unfoldings on the other, are to be complemented with discourse research that considers the inherent characteristics of discourse and its relationship to and relevance for organizational process. Second, that organizing discourse is discourse that mediates between specifying and dedifferentiating moments of representation, by interposing standardizing categories, inscriptions and material appearances; only in this way is discourse able to connect the specific and the personalized with the general, abstract, and depersonalized. Third, the paper argues that the paperbased medical record largely absolves clinicians from âorganizingâ clinical care as it is defined in this paper: its discourse (content, visual appearance, rules governing authorship) remains âun-organizingâ. Finally, it is argued that the electronic PCIS is being framed in discourse that standardizes how clinical care is informated, and potentially even intervenes in the substance of that care; and while at greater risk of bringing about âbad recordsâ (Garfinkel 1967), such âorganizing discourseâ ultimately achieves âlines of forceâ across and beyond the clinic.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: