Opportunity Lost: In Search of Justice for Victims of Sexual Assault

The University of New South Wales Law Journal
Publication Type:
Journal Article
The University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2005, 28 (3), pp. 758 - 779
Issue Date:
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description SizeFormat
2005003063.pdf1.45 MBAdobe PDF
Five children, sexually abused by a perpetrator known to them, were recently denied compensatory redress under the Victims Support and Rehabilitation Act 1996 (NSW) (`VSRA).[1] The children were unsuccessful because the NSW Court of Appeal held they had not provided evidence of their injuries. The case arose out of the introduction of `offence-based sexual assault provisions into the New South Wales criminal injuries compensation scheme. The term `offence-based refers to an approach that primarily assesses the amount of compensation on the basis of the criminal seriousness of the perpetrators conduct rather than the severity of the victims injuries.[2] The purpose of introducing an offence-based approach for this group of victims, this note argues, was to reduce the arduous nature of the application process, thereby signalling a timely recognition of the historical discrimination faced by victims of sexual abuse in accessing the scheme. The inadequate drafting of the provisions had however led to uncertainty amongst practitioners and academics alike regarding the requirement to provide proof of injury.[3]
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: