This thesis explores the challenges and negotiations within the ‘lifestyle migration’ or sea/tree
change of working people, to places rich in nature but ‘lean’ in industry. It examines how they
overcome social, environmental and economic challenges in the process of negotiating a new
life. The research is founded upon an empirical study in conjunction with relevant literature
and theoretical analysis.
The inquiry stems from the need to address the growing popularity of the lifestyle migration
phenomenon, where approximately two thirds of working aged migrants within the study site
‘fail’ within five years, and greater indications of ‘failure’ are found elsewhere in Australia.
In this research, lifestyle migration is positioned as a quest for self-actualisation where the
contradiction exists of seeking a better life through a pathway of risk in unknown landscapes of
apparently limited opportunities, often resulting in the experience of a somewhat more
difficult life. In order to reach self-actualisation, lifestyle migrants must undergo the trials of
changing environmental, social and economic paradigms in the process.
In exposing how the survivors have managed to survive, this study identifies the renegotiation
of values with a particular emphasis towards control over one’s own life. It is suggested that
for many lifestyle migrants, living a life orchestrated by the power structures of social
expectations has failed the individual, who in turn, seeks to empower themselves by choosing
a different ideology. However, new measures of status become apparent through lifestyle
migration, as found in the research. Control over one’s own life and status issues are two of 30
themes explored in the narrative analysis of the study, where participants stemmed from
diverse socio-economic positions and represented both the coastal and hinterland townships
within the study site.
In order to understand how the survivors managed to survive, the research employs a unique
approach in exploring the relationship between adult education perspectives focusing on
reflexive identity and innovation theories, as well as educational perspectives of self-efficacy
and emotional intelligence.
The findings suggest that lifestyle migrants need to be creative in order to survive through
reflexivity with external factors, positioning the process of the relocation as a creative act.
The research argues that such a reflexive construction encourages a pioneering spirit among
the survivors in displaying flexibility, accepting risk and adopting a self-reliant approach
towards work and community involvement. These ‘small town pioneers’ embrace the wild
frontier without the familiar structures of urban society, changing work and developing skill
sets in order to survive. Creativity is crucial in such problem-solving, along with a
reorchestration of values.
Cross-disciplinary fields involved in the exploration include studies in education in lifelong
learning, self-efficacy and emotional intelligence; anthropology and sociology pertaining to
lifestyle migration research; geography in explorations of transmigration and home; and
philosophy in relation to status and the search for meaning.
Critically, this thesis considers existing lifestyle migration research where cultural implications
pertaining to its country of origin are exposed, positioning the phenomenon as a nonhomogenous
entity on a global scale. Locally, the empirical work further supports a lack of
homogeny within the paradigm through a detailed exploration of interpretations within the
findings. Such perceptions and their implications are previously unaddressed in academic
discussion around the topic.
This thesis is a Doctor of Education by Portfolio, comprising four sets of components or
artefacts – the thesis metastatement, a book, journal articles and audience participation tools
– which contribute to both knowledge and to practice. Each of the portfolio’s artefacts hold
specific aims, however the contribution of the thesis as a body of work is threefold:
1 Presenting findings which governing authorities may incorporate to inform their
socio-cultural-economic decisions regarding non-urban migration;
2 Presenting an opportunity for transfer of learning for new and potential lifestyle
migrants in exposing limiting and facilitating factors involved in the quest socially,
culturally and economically;
3 Combining traditionally disparate concepts – creativity theory and identity theory
– to understand the problem of the sustainability of lifestyle migration among