An Ontological Framework to Manage the Relative Conflicts between Security and Usability Requirements

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Search OPUS


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mairiza, D
dc.contributor.author Zowghi, D
dc.contributor.editor Maalej, W
dc.contributor.editor Thurimella, AK
dc.contributor.editor Felfernig, A
dc.date.accessioned 2012-02-02T11:07:31Z
dc.date.issued 2010-01
dc.identifier.citation The Third International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MaRK 2010), 2010, pp. 1 - 6
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-4244-8784-4
dc.identifier.other E1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/16193
dc.description.abstract Non Functional Requirements (NFRs) are relative, so are the conflicts among them. In our previously developed catalogue of NFRs conflicts it can be observed that a number of specific pairs of NFRs are claimed to be in conflicts in some cases but they are also claimed not to be in conflict in the other cases. These relative conflicts occur because the positive or negative relationships among NFRs are not always clear and obvious. These relationships might change depending on the meaning of NFRs within the system being developed. This paper focuses on the application of ontology in managing the relative conflicts among NFRs, particularly the relative conflicts between security and usability requirements. The aim is to develop a framework to identify, characterize, and define corresponding resolution strategies for the security-usability conflicts. This paper thus describes the sureCM framework to manage these conflicts; summarizes the security-usability conflicts ontology; and demonstrates how the ontology will be used as a basis to assist analysts in managing conflicts between security and usability requirements.
dc.publisher IEEE
dc.relation.hasversion Accepted manuscript version
dc.relation.isbasedon 10.1109/MARK.2010.5623814
dc.title An Ontological Framework to Manage the Relative Conflicts between Security and Usability Requirements
dc.type Conference Proceeding
dc.parent The Third International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MaRK 2010)
dc.journal.number en_US
dc.publocation USA en_US
dc.publocation USA
dc.publocation USA
dc.publocation USA
dc.publocation USA
dc.publocation USA
dc.publocation USA
dc.publocation USA
dc.publocation USA
dc.identifier.startpage 1 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 6 en_US
dc.cauo.name FEIT.School of Software en_US
dc.conference Verified OK en_US
dc.conference International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge
dc.conference International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge
dc.conference International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge
dc.conference International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge
dc.conference International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge
dc.conference International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge
dc.conference International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge
dc.conference International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge
dc.for 080303 Computer System Security
dc.personcode 000569
dc.personcode 10685877
dc.percentage 100 en_US
dc.classification.name Computer System Security en_US
dc.classification.type FOR-08 en_US
dc.edition en_US
dc.custom International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge en_US
dc.date.activity 20100927 en_US
dc.date.activity 2010-09-27
dc.date.activity 2010-09-27
dc.date.activity 2010-09-27
dc.date.activity 2010-09-27
dc.date.activity 2010-09-27
dc.date.activity 2010-09-27
dc.date.activity 2010-09-27
dc.date.activity 2010-09-27
dc.location.activity Sydney, Australia en_US
dc.location.activity Sydney, Australia
dc.location.activity Sydney, Australia
dc.location.activity Sydney, Australia
dc.location.activity Sydney, Australia
dc.location.activity Sydney, Australia
dc.location.activity Sydney, Australia
dc.location.activity Sydney, Australia
dc.location.activity Sydney, Australia
dc.description.keywords conflicts , framework , management , non-functional requirements , ontology , relative , security , usability en_US
dc.description.keywords conflicts , framework , management , non-functional requirements , ontology , relative , security , usability
dc.description.keywords conflicts , framework , management , non-functional requirements , ontology , relative , security , usability
dc.description.keywords conflicts , framework , management , non-functional requirements , ontology , relative , security , usability
dc.description.keywords conflicts , framework , management , non-functional requirements , ontology , relative , security , usability
dc.description.keywords conflicts , framework , management , non-functional requirements , ontology , relative , security , usability
dc.description.keywords conflicts , framework , management , non-functional requirements , ontology , relative , security , usability
dc.description.keywords conflicts , framework , management , non-functional requirements , ontology , relative , security , usability
dc.description.keywords conflicts , framework , management , non-functional requirements , ontology , relative , security , usability
pubs.embargo.period Not known
pubs.organisational-group /University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Software
pubs.organisational-group /University of Technology Sydney/Strength - Human Centred Technology Design


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record