The writing cure?: ethical considerations in managing creative practice lifewriting projects

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Search OPUS

Advanced Search


My Account

Show simple item record Joseph, SA Rickett, C
dc.contributor.editor Joseph, S
dc.contributor.editor Rickett, C 2012-02-02T11:12:06Z 2010-01
dc.identifier.citation Strange Bedfellows or Perfect Partners - Refereed Conference Papers of the 15th Annual AAWP Conference, 2010, pp. 1 - 11
dc.identifier.isbn 978-0-9807573-3-0
dc.identifier.other E1 en_US
dc.description.abstract The autobiographical turn in literary studies has increasingly placed value on selfrepresentation as a strategic means of reclaiming voice, identity and agency. By and large, the narrating 'I' is circulated and read as a storied performance/product which empowers the writer. Typically such texts are often ones that rehearse, record and expiate individual trauma, and also produce a set of readings that textually frame the work as 'therapeutic'. There is a growing selection of texts which narrativise personal trauma now being set for literary examination in tertiary syllabi. Concurrent to the formal reading of trauma texts in the context of literary studies is the narrative impulse to repackage traumatic experience as autobiographical process/literary output within creative practice higher degrees. This paper seeks to interrogate some of the ethical concerns that arise from students drawing on personal trauma in creative writing contexts for the production of literature that is to be formally supervised and examined. How is the potential risk of re-traumatisation of the student, and vicarious traumatisation of the supervisor/lecturer, managed? If higher degrees are providing an emergent space for catharsis, 'unofficially' offering writing as a therapeutic mode in creative practice, what are the implications of the supervisor/lecturer moving from a role of artistic and scholarly critic, to one of bearing witness? And in this newly formed therapeutic alliance, does an academic need more skills than they have developed in simply delivering a writing or literary curriculum? And what professional frames of support, if any, are in place to sustain both the student and the academic throughout the process? Without well-established professional support and guidelines, is commodifying trauma in order to gain a degree, and or a literary output, ethical professional practice?
dc.publisher The Australian Association of Writing Programs
dc.title The writing cure?: ethical considerations in managing creative practice lifewriting projects
dc.type Conference Proceeding
dc.parent Strange Bedfellows or Perfect Partners - Refereed Conference Papers of the 15th Annual AAWP Conference
dc.journal.number en_US
dc.publocation Guyra, Australia en_US
dc.publocation New York, USA
dc.identifier.startpage 1 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 11 en_US FASS.Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences en_US
dc.conference Verified OK en_US
dc.conference Australasian Association of Writing Programs
dc.for 1904 Performing Arts and Creative Writing
dc.personcode 970675
dc.percentage 100 en_US Performing Arts and Creative Writing en_US
dc.classification.type FOR-08 en_US
dc.edition en_US
dc.edition First
dc.custom Australasian Association of Writing Programs en_US 20101125 en_US 2010-11-25
dc.location.activity Melbourne, Australia en_US
dc.description.keywords memoir - trauma - ethics - supervision en_US
dc.description.keywords NA
pubs.embargo.period Not known
pubs.organisational-group /University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
pubs.organisational-group /University of Technology Sydney/Strength - Creative Practices and the Cultural Economy
utslib.copyright.status Open Access 2015-04-15 12:23:47.074767+10
utslib.collection.history General (ID: 2)

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record