Qualitatively different ways of differentiating student achievement: a phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of grade descriptors

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Search OPUS

Advanced Search


My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Prosser, M. en_US
dc.contributor.author Tan, H. K en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-12-21T02:36:00Z
dc.date.available 2009-12-21T02:36:00Z
dc.date.issued 2007 en_US
dc.identifier 2004001857 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Tan, H. and Prosser, M. 2007 'Qualitatively different ways of differentiating student achievement: a phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of grade descriptors', Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 739-745. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0260-2938 en_US
dc.identifier.other C1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/4985
dc.description.abstract The term 'grade descriptors' has commonly been used to refer to the practice of describing for students characteristic work that would merit different grades. This paper reports the results of a phenomenographic study on the different ways that academic staff understood and practised grade descriptors as forms of standards-based assessment. Four qualitatively different conceptions of grade descriptors were identified. Firstly, grade descriptors were described as 'generic descriptors' as they depict achievement levels as descriptions of standards for generic purposes. Secondly, grade descriptors were understood as 'grade distributors' as they focus on how students' work can be understood in terms of how they are distributed amongst different levels of achievement. Thirdly, grade descriptors were labelled as 'grade indicators' since they indicate to staff and students what a piece of student's work might mean in terms of specific criteria. Finally, grade descriptors were labelled as grade interpreters since they are perceived as authentic bodies of intrinsic meaning as to what actual achievement levels are. Through its fmdings, this study seeks to provide a basis for identifying and resolving different expectations for understanding and practising grade descriptors as well as clarifying the place of standards and criteria in assessment. Each of the conceptions is discussed in terms of providing a form of standards-based assessment. Suggestions for enhancing the use of-grade descriptors as standards-based assessment are then made. en_US
dc.publisher Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01446190701429804 en_US
dc.title Qualitatively different ways of differentiating student achievement: a phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of grade descriptors en_US
dc.parent Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education en_US
dc.journal.volume 29 en_US
dc.journal.number 3 en_US
dc.publocation Abingdon, UK en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 739 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 745 en_US
dc.cauo.name School of Built Environment en_US
utslib.copyright.status Closed Access
utslib.copyright.date 2015-04-15 12:17:09.805752+10
pubs.declined 2014-11-24T16:14:08.109+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-13T12:08:50.152+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-13T12:08:50.229+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-13T17:30:38.767+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-13T17:40:17.808+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-13T18:33:07.616+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-13T20:42:41.463+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-13T20:45:26.400+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-13T21:05:17.273+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-13T21:21:10.912+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-13T21:43:43.879+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-13T22:58:04.518+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-13T23:03:58.141+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-13T23:06:02.75+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-14T00:12:07.401+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-14T00:12:36.304+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-14T00:12:44.490+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-14T00:53:24.345+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-14T01:52:39.131+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-14T01:56:59.189+1100
pubs.declined 2015-03-14T02:16:04.590+1100

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record