Alternative Intellectual Property?

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Search OPUS

Advanced Search


My Account

Show simple item record Bowrey, K 2010-05-14T07:48:00Z 2010-05-14T07:48:00Z en_US 2006-01
dc.identifier.citation Macquarie Law Journal, 2006, 6 (1), pp. 65 - 93
dc.identifier.issn 1445-386X
dc.identifier.other C1 en_US
dc.description.abstract This article takes up the workshop theme of `Customs in Common in an attempt to locate, or create, a space for an Aboriginal dialogue about legal rights in the context of indigenous culture and intellectual property law. Can Australian law create a space for a dialogue with indigenous people that allows for a form of indigenous autonomy or self-determination? How can Aboriginal law or custom be given contemporary meaning, significance and impact on Australian law? At the outset, (at least) two problems stand out. The first is political in nature. Who is it that can speak `for indigenous people? As Aboriginal writer, Irene Watson, explains, The idea of speaking `for is alien to my knowledge of the possibilities of an Aboriginal political representation. There has never been an Aboriginal dialogue that has given over to this concept that is of giving the Aboriginal voice a political representative quality.[1] This is not a problem of there being a lack of Aboriginal political structures, but a problem with the forms of Aboriginal political representation that the Australian political system can recognise.
dc.publisher Division of Law, Macquarie University
dc.title Alternative Intellectual Property?
dc.type Journal Article
dc.parent Macquarie Law Journal
dc.journal.volume 1
dc.journal.volume 6
dc.journal.number en_US
dc.journal.number 1 en_US
dc.publocation Sydney, Australia en_US
dc.publocation Seoul, Korea
dc.identifier.startpage 65 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 93 en_US LAW.Faculty of law en_US
dc.conference Verified OK en_US
dc.conference IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology
dc.for 180115 Intellectual Property Law
dc.personcode 999201
dc.percentage 75 en_US Intellectual Property Law en_US
dc.classification.type FOR-08 en_US 2006-09-20
dc.location.activity Seoul, Korea
dc.description.keywords NA en_US
dc.description.keywords MAC, QoS, ATM
pubs.embargo.period Not known
pubs.organisational-group /University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Law
utslib.copyright.status Closed Access 2015-04-15 12:17:09.805752+10
utslib.collection.history Closed (ID: 3)

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record