Equitable Compensation for breach of fiduciary duty: Causation and contribution - The High Court dodges a fusion fallacy in Pilmer

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Search OPUS


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lynch, AN
dc.date.accessioned 2010-05-14T07:48:11Z
dc.date.created 2010-05-14T07:48:11Z en_US
dc.date.issued 2001-01
dc.identifier.citation Australian Bar Review, 2001, 29 pp. 173 - 190
dc.identifier.issn 0814-8589
dc.identifier.other C1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10453/6577
dc.publisher Butterworths
dc.title Equitable Compensation for breach of fiduciary duty: Causation and contribution - The High Court dodges a fusion fallacy in Pilmer
dc.type Journal Article
dc.parent Australian Bar Review
dc.journal.volume 29
dc.journal.number en_US
dc.publocation Sydney, Australia en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 173 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 190 en_US
dc.cauo.name LAW.Faculty of law en_US
dc.conference Verified OK en_US
dc.for 1801 Law
dc.personcode 990769
dc.percentage 100 en_US
dc.classification.name Law en_US
dc.classification.type FOR-08 en_US
dc.description.keywords effluent organic matter
dc.description.keywords foulant characteristics
dc.description.keywords nanofiltration
pubs.embargo.period Not known
pubs.organisational-group /University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Law


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record