Validation and calibration of the SF-36 health transition question against an external criterion of clinical change in health status

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Search OPUS

Advanced Search


My Account

Show simple item record Knox, SA King, MT 2010-05-28T09:51:40Z 2009-01
dc.identifier.citation Quality of Life Research, 2009, 18 (5), pp. 637 - 645
dc.identifier.issn 0962-9343
dc.identifier.other C1 en_US
dc.description.abstract Purpose Cross-sectional surveys depend on retrospective health transition questions (HTQ) to estimate recent changes in health status. This paper assesses the validity of the SF-36 HTQ and calibrates its categories against change assessed prospectively on the SF-36 domain scales in a sub-group known to have experienced clinically important changes in health status. Methods Adults (n = 9,649) from a longitudinal population survey completed the SF-36 in 2001 and 2002. Prospective measures were calculated as mean changes in SF-36 scale scores adjusted for age and gender, and also expressed as standardised response means. Comparison groups were those who had developed a long-term health condition since the last interview and the HTQ response categories for those who had not developed any new conditions. Results Those with a new condition and those without a new condition but who described their health as somewhat worse than a year ago had comparable declines in health status on all domain scales except role physical, where those with a new condition experienced a greater decline. Conclusions This analysis demonstrates the validity and limitations of the HTQ as a measure of change in population studies. The calibration is useful for interpreting the meaning of the HTQ categories at the group level but not at the individual level.
dc.publisher Springer
dc.relation.hasversion Accepted manuscript version en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon 10.1007/s11136-009-9467-1
dc.rights The original publication is available at en_US
dc.title Validation and calibration of the SF-36 health transition question against an external criterion of clinical change in health status
dc.type Journal Article
dc.parent Quality of Life Research
dc.journal.volume 5
dc.journal.volume 18
dc.journal.number 5 en_US
dc.publocation Netherlands en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 637 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 645 en_US BUS.Faculty of Business en_US
dc.conference Verified OK en_US
dc.for 1117 Public Health and Health Services
dc.personcode 020118
dc.personcode 998486
dc.percentage 100 en_US Public Health and Health Services en_US
dc.classification.type FOR-08 en_US
dc.edition en_US
dc.custom en_US en_US
dc.location.activity en_US
dc.description.keywords Health transition question - Anchor-based methods - Population studies - Prospective change - Retrospective recall en_US
pubs.embargo.period Not known
pubs.organisational-group /University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group /University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business
pubs.organisational-group /University of Technology Sydney/Strength - Health Economics and Research Evaluation
utslib.copyright.status Open Access 2015-04-15 12:23:47.074767+10
utslib.collection.history General (ID: 2)

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record