Corpus modificatus : transmutational belonging and posthuman becoming

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Search OPUS

Advanced Search


My Account

Show simple item record Massie, Raya 2008-03-14T05:39:41Z 2012-12-15T03:51:53Z 2008-03-14T05:39:41Z 2012-12-15T03:51:53Z 2008
dc.description University of Technology, Sydney. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. en_AU
dc.description NO FULL TEXT AVAILABLE. Access is restricted indefinitely.
dc.description.abstract NO FULL TEXT AVAILABLE. Access is restricted indefinitely. ----- My grandfather was in a fix. He wasn’t black, like his father, but he wasn’t quite white either, like his mother. He was marrying a woman who also wasn’t-black-but-wasn’t­quite-white. The problem was that his mother was worried that her future daughter-in-law’s father was a bit too ‘dark, Oriental looking’, whilst her mother was worried because his father was half-black ‘negro’. It really was a case of pot calling kettle black. And she was already three months pregnant, so everyone was worried about whether ‘the throwback thing’ would mean that they would have a black, ‘negro’ baby. My grandparents had managed to modify their ‘brown’ bodies so they could ‘pass’ as ‘white’, but could they also somehow also modify their potentially ‘non-white’ offspring? What might the materially affective mechanisms be, that have the power to ‘fix’ bodies, so as that a brown body can become white? Franken-rat, in a different time and place, was a rat in a laboratory who had a human ear growing on its back. Its body was hideous, a monstrous blend of ratty-human flesh. Franken-rat lived and died in a laboratory, in the service of science and humanity. But how does its body, and the discourses surrounding it, materialise certain understandings about our bodies and their relationships to ‘others’ and to the world? How might our bodies understand that relationship? If my understanding of my relationship to ‘others’ is based upon a liberal humanist construct that separates ‘self’ from ‘other’ and such fleshy intertwinings as monstrous, then can I ‘become posthuman’ and affectively create that relationship as a generous and welcoming of ‘otherness’? Can posthumanism ‘overcome’ the abjection and horror of liberal humanist ideas of monstrosity? This thesis is a fictocritical exploration of bodies and their dynamic discursive and material relations with the world. If the world is a site continually in flux, how might bodies modify or be modified in order to continually belong to it? And how might we sift through the facts, the stories and the affects of family narratives, institutional spaces, historical documents, philosophical ideas, and cultural texts, discourses and practices, in order to find spaces of integrity in connection and becoming, and affective, corporeal knowledges to take into the future? en_AU
dc.language.iso en en_AU
dc.subject Racism. en_AU
dc.subject Whiteness. en_AU
dc.subject Cultural analysis. en_AU
dc.subject Bodies. en_AU
dc.subject Posthumanism. en_AU
dc.subject Australian history. en_AU
dc.subject Fictocritical writing. en_AU
dc.subject Nietzsche. en_AU
dc.title Corpus modificatus : transmutational belonging and posthuman becoming en_AU
dc.type Thesis (PhD) en_AU
utslib.copyright.status Closed Access 2015-04-15 12:17:09.805752+10

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record