Revisiting the business judgment rule

Harris, J; Hargovan, A

Revisiting the business judgment rule

Harris, J

Hargovan, A

Permalink

Publisher:: Governance Institute of Australia
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Governance Directions, 2014, 66 (10), pp. 634 - 637
Issue Date:: 2014-11-03

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	Revisiting the business judgment rule.pdf	Published Version	119.35 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Harris, J https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7099-4694	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Hargovan, A	en_US
dc.date.issued	2014-11-03	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Governance Directions, 2014, 66 (10), pp. 634 - 637	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	2203-4749	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/115951
dc.description.abstract	The personal liability of company directors has been a source of debate for some time. The issue has evoked strong responses from industry groups such as the Law Council of Australia and the AICD, and has resulted in several public inquiries into the issue dating back to the Commonwealth Senate’s Cooney Report in 1989 and several subsequent reports by CAMAC.1	en_US
dc.publisher	Governance Institute of Australia	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Governance Directions	en_US
dc.title	Revisiting the business judgment rule	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	10	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	66	en_US
utslib.for	180109 Corporations and Associations Law	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Law
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	false	en_US
pubs.issue	10	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	66	en_US

Abstract:

The personal liability of company directors has been a source of debate for some time. The issue has evoked strong responses from industry groups such as the Law Council of Australia and the AICD, and has resulted in several public inquiries into the issue dating back to the Commonwealth Senate’s Cooney Report in 1989 and several subsequent reports by CAMAC.1

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/115951