Evidence in Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review Protocol

Ambreen, T; Ikram, N; Usman, M; Bano, M

Evidence in Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review Protocol

Ambreen, T Ikram, N Usman, M Bano, M

Permalink

Publisher:: IARIA
Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2011) Proceedings, 2011
Issue Date:: 2011-10-23

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published versionAdobe PDF (187.3 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Ambreen, T	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Ikram, N	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Usman, M	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Bano, M https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1447-9521	en_US
dc.date	2011-10-23	en_US
dc.date.issued	2011-10-23	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2011) Proceedings, 2011	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	978-1-61208-165-6	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/119482
dc.description.abstract	Requirements Engineering (RE) is recognized as one of the critical phases in software development. RE has its own journals and conferences where lots of work has been published. As the area is maturing, increasingly large numbers of empirically supported studies have been reported in RE. There is a need to synthesize evidence based RE literature. We plan to systematically investigate evidence based RE studies to see and report state of the art in evidence based RE reported research. This paper aims at providing a systematic literature review (SLR) protocol to describe a process for synthesizing the empirically supported work in the area of RE that will eventually present a state of the art of the field. This SLR intends to not only summarize the empirical data regarding RE but will also be helpful for various practitioners in this field to find out areas of RE rich in terms of tools, techniques, frameworks, models and guidelines to aid in their work. It will also facilitate RE researchers to identify knowledge gaps to recognize needs and chances for future research directions in this field.	en_US
dc.publisher	IARIA	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2011) Proceedings	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	International Conference on Software Engineering Advances	en_US
dc.title	Evidence in Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review Protocol	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.location.activity	Barcelona, Spain	en_US
utslib.for	0803 Computer Software	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences/FASS Faculty Administration
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.consider-herdc	false	en_US
pubs.finish-date	2011-10-29	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.start-date	2011-10-23	en_US

Abstract:

Requirements Engineering (RE) is recognized as one of the critical phases in software development. RE has its own journals and conferences where lots of work has been published. As the area is maturing, increasingly large numbers of empirically supported studies have been reported in RE. There is a need to synthesize evidence based RE literature. We plan to systematically investigate evidence based RE studies to see and report state of the art in evidence based RE reported research. This paper aims at providing a systematic literature review (SLR) protocol to describe a process for synthesizing the empirically supported work in the area of RE that will eventually present a state of the art of the field. This SLR intends to not only summarize the empirical data regarding RE but will also be helpful for various practitioners in this field to find out areas of RE rich in terms of tools, techniques, frameworks, models and guidelines to aid in their work. It will also facilitate RE researchers to identify knowledge gaps to recognize needs and chances for future research directions in this field.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/119482