Rhetoric in municipal amalgamations: a comparative analysis
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Local Government Studies, 2018
- Issue Date:
Files in This Item:
|Rhetoric in Municipal Amalgamations A Comparative Analysis_am.pdf||Accepted Manuscript Version||175.64 kB|
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is currently unavailable due to the publisher's embargo.
The embargo period expires on 26 Mar 2020
© 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. There is a large literature that seeks to evaluate municipal amalgamations ex post, but a relative dearth of scholarly inquiry into the practical political task of persuading the public to accept amalgamations ex ante. We address this important gap in the literature by conducting a rhetorical analysis to ascertain what types of arguments are believed to be efficacious for persuasion on amalgamation. We find evidence to suggest belief in the efficacy of persuading the public through recourse to various projected dreadful consequences, particularly amongst opponents of amalgamation. We conclude by considering some of the reasons behind the observed rhetorics and briefly outline one possible solution.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: