Third sector governance in Asia: Tracking hybridity

Onyx, J; Coventry, L; Kenny, S; Fanany, I

Third sector governance in Asia: Tracking hybridity

Onyx, J

Coventry, L Kenny, S

Fanany, I

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Cosmopolitan Civil Societies, 2018, 10 (3), pp. 1 - 18
Issue Date:: 2018-01-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Published VersionAdobe PDF (183.92 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Onyx, J https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7166-833X	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Coventry, L	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Kenny, S https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9586-4439	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Fanany, I	en_US
dc.date.issued	2018-01-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Cosmopolitan Civil Societies, 2018, 10 (3), pp. 1 - 18	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/129517
dc.description.abstract	© 2018 by the author(s). Starting with the premise that modern western notions of good governance may be misdirected within a context of traditional Asian civil societies, this article investigates third sector governance practices in Southeast Asia. Case studies from different data sources are presented to suggest that there is no one ideal form of governance or accountability in Southeast Asian third sector organisations. Applying a western lens can serve to deflect attention away from the ways in which contextual factors affect the thinking and practices of accountability of local actors. The paper concludes that a process of hybridisation in governance models is taking place in Southeast Asian societies.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Cosmopolitan Civil Societies	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.5130/ccs.v10.i3.5922	en_US
dc.title	Third sector governance in Asia: Tracking hybridity	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	3	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	10	en_US
utslib.for	1608 Sociology	en_US
utslib.for	1503 Business and Management	en_US
utslib.for	15 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services	en_US
utslib.for	16 Studies in Human Society	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/e-Press
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business/Management Discipline
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.issue	3	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	10	en_US

Abstract:

© 2018 by the author(s). Starting with the premise that modern western notions of good governance may be misdirected within a context of traditional Asian civil societies, this article investigates third sector governance practices in Southeast Asia. Case studies from different data sources are presented to suggest that there is no one ideal form of governance or accountability in Southeast Asian third sector organisations. Applying a western lens can serve to deflect attention away from the ways in which contextual factors affect the thinking and practices of accountability of local actors. The paper concludes that a process of hybridisation in governance models is taking place in Southeast Asian societies.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/129517