Appointing Attorneys-General to the High Court: A case for reform
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Alternative Law Journal, 2017, 42 (4), pp. 286 - 291
- Issue Date:
Files in This Item:
|Bai and Hobbs (2017) - Appointing AGs to the HCA - Alt LJ.pdf||Published Version||78.09 kB|
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017. Throughout 2016, Attorney-General George Brandis QC repeatedly denied he intended to leave the Federal Parliament and take up a position on the High Court of Australia. In this article we explore the experiences of the two most recent politicians-cum-High Court Justices: Garfield Barwick and Lionel Murphy; and note that Australia’s current judicial appointment process would have permitted Brandis to make a similar transition. We argue that this process should be revamped to enhance transparency and accountability in the appointments process, to the benefit of our judicial system and its public perception.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: