Relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital settings: a scoping review protocol

Alabdaly, A; Debono, D; Hinchcliff, R; Hor, S-Y

Relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital settings: a scoping review protocol

Alabdaly, A Debono, D

Hinchcliff, R

Hor, S-Y

Permalink

Publisher:: BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: BMJ Open, 2021, 11, (5), pp. e049873
Issue Date:: 2021-05-31

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (335.6 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Alabdaly, A
dc.contributor.author	Debono, D https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2095-156X
dc.contributor.author	Hinchcliff, R https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9920-4211
dc.contributor.author	Hor, S-Y
dc.date.accessioned	2021-12-06T03:01:39Z
dc.date.available	2021-12-06T03:01:39Z
dc.date.issued	2021-05-31
dc.identifier.citation	BMJ Open, 2021, 11, (5), pp. e049873
dc.identifier.issn	2044-6055
dc.identifier.issn	2044-6055
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/152133
dc.description.abstract	<h4>Introduction</h4>Hospitals commonly examine patient safety culture and other quality indicators to evaluate and improve performance in relation to quality and safety. A growing body of research has separately examined relationships between patient safety culture and patient experience on clinical outcomes and other quality indicators. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding the relationship between these two important domains. This article describes the protocol for a scoping review of published literature examining the relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital settings. The scoping review will provide an overview of research into the relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital contexts, map key concepts underpinning these domains and identify research gaps for further study.<h4>Methods and analysis</h4>The scoping review will be conducted using the five stages of Arksey and O'Malley's framework: identify the research question; identify relevant studies; study selection; chart data; and collate, summarise and report the results. The inclusion criteria will be applied using the Population, Concept and Context Framework. Searches will be conducted in the CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus and SciELO databases, without applying date range limits. Hand-searching of grey literature will also be performed to find relevant, non-indexed literature. Data will be extracted using a standardised data extraction form developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Both descriptive and thematic analyses will be undertaken to scope key concepts within the body of reviewed literature.<h4>Ethics and dissemination</h4>This type of study does not require an ethics review. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.
dc.format	Electronic
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
dc.relation.ispartof	BMJ Open
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049873
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject	1103 Clinical Sciences, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Safety Management
dc.subject.mesh	Research Design
dc.subject.mesh	Hospitals
dc.subject.mesh	Review Literature as Topic
dc.subject.mesh	Patient Safety
dc.subject.mesh	Patient Outcome Assessment
dc.subject.mesh	Systematic Reviews as Topic
dc.subject.mesh	Hospitals
dc.subject.mesh	Humans
dc.subject.mesh	Patient Outcome Assessment
dc.subject.mesh	Patient Safety
dc.subject.mesh	Research Design
dc.subject.mesh	Review Literature as Topic
dc.subject.mesh	Safety Management
dc.subject.mesh	Systematic Reviews as Topic
dc.title	Relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital settings: a scoping review protocol
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	11
utslib.location.activity	England
utslib.for	1103 Clinical Sciences
utslib.for	1117 Public Health and Health Services
utslib.for	1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Health
utslib.copyright.status	open_access	*
dc.date.updated	2021-12-06T03:01:38Z
pubs.issue	5
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	11
utslib.citation.issue	5

Abstract:

Introduction

Hospitals commonly examine patient safety culture and other quality indicators to evaluate and improve performance in relation to quality and safety. A growing body of research has separately examined relationships between patient safety culture and patient experience on clinical outcomes and other quality indicators. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding the relationship between these two important domains. This article describes the protocol for a scoping review of published literature examining the relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital settings. The scoping review will provide an overview of research into the relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital contexts, map key concepts underpinning these domains and identify research gaps for further study.

Methods and analysis

The scoping review will be conducted using the five stages of Arksey and O'Malley's framework: identify the research question; identify relevant studies; study selection; chart data; and collate, summarise and report the results. The inclusion criteria will be applied using the Population, Concept and Context Framework. Searches will be conducted in the CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus and SciELO databases, without applying date range limits. Hand-searching of grey literature will also be performed to find relevant, non-indexed literature. Data will be extracted using a standardised data extraction form developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Both descriptive and thematic analyses will be undertaken to scope key concepts within the body of reviewed literature.

Ethics and dissemination

This type of study does not require an ethics review. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/152133