Performance investigation on three-classes of MANET routing protocols

Abolhasn, M; Wysocki, T; Lipman, J

Performance investigation on three-classes of MANET routing protocols

Abolhasn, M

Wysocki, T Lipman, J

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: 2005 Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications, 2005, 2005 pp. 774 - 778
Issue Date:: 2005-12-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2012005215OK.pdf		175.73 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Abolhasn, M https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4282-6666	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Wysocki, T	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Lipman, J https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2877-1168	en_US
dc.date.issued	2005-12-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	2005 Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications, 2005, 2005 pp. 774 - 778	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	0780391322	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9780780391321	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/23646
dc.description.abstract	Routing in Ad hoc Networks has received significant attention with a number of different routing protocols proposed in recent years. These routing protocols may be classified into three main categories: proactive, reactive and hybrid. Prior work aimed at comparing the performance of routing protocols has mainly focused on comparing reactive and proactive protocols [6] [4] [1]. In this paper, we present a simulation study of different routing protocols from all three categories. We also explore the benefits and performance of each routing category. Further, we present a discussion of future research directions for routing in Ad hoc Networks. © 2005 IEEE.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	2005 Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1109/APCC.2005.1554167	en_US
dc.title	Performance investigation on three-classes of MANET routing protocols	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.citation.volume	2005	en_US
utslib.for	100503 Computer Communications Networks	en_US
dc.location.activity	Perth, WA	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Electrical and Data Engineering
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CRIN - Realtime Information Networks
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - GBDTC - Global Big Data Technologies
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	2005	en_US

Abstract:

Routing in Ad hoc Networks has received significant attention with a number of different routing protocols proposed in recent years. These routing protocols may be classified into three main categories: proactive, reactive and hybrid. Prior work aimed at comparing the performance of routing protocols has mainly focused on comparing reactive and proactive protocols [6] [4] [1]. In this paper, we present a simulation study of different routing protocols from all three categories. We also explore the benefits and performance of each routing category. Further, we present a discussion of future research directions for routing in Ad hoc Networks. © 2005 IEEE.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/23646