Experimental study of aerodynamic noise from the trailing edge and leading edge of blades in a coaxial-double shaft fan

Publication Type:
Conference Proceeding
Citation:
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fluids Engineering Division (Publication) FEDSM, 2013, 1 B
Issue Date:
2013-12-01
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2013001189OK.pdf1.3 MB
Adobe PDF
Proactive acoustic noise control technologies in wind turbines and blowers have in recent years been the focus of intensive research to integrate wind turbines in residential building and to address public concerns on noise pollution. However efforts to understand the mechanics has been inconclusive, mainly due to the complexity and commercial confidentiality of the topic The paper reports on the experimental investigation on two methods in controlling aerodynamic noise. A counter-rotating-double-row-turbine with variable gap/spacing (s) was designed, built and tested. Serrations were designed and attached on the leading edge and the trailing edge of the blades to proactively control aerodynamic noise. The model was operated in fan-mode and air velocity, shaft-revolution; electric-fan-power, acoustic noise amplitude (dB) and Centre frequency (CF in Hz) were measured for a number of spacing and serrations. Coefficients of Performance (COP), dB, CF were plotted against tip speed (TS). It was noticed that: • The double-shaft-fan has operated quieter than the single shaft fan especially as TS decreases. Acoustic noise (dB) dropped 20% at TS=4m/s to less than 2% at TS=10m/s. Efficiency and CF increased in the double-shaft fan as TS increased. Spacing variation between blade-rows had insignificant effect on the dB, Cf, and efficiency. • Serrations on single-shaft fan have also reduced dB (up to 10%), increased efficiency and CF with more positive effects with the serrations on the leading edge than the trailing edge. Serrations are more effective at higher TS range. • Serrations on a double-shaft fan with an optimum spacing, reduced acoustic noise (dB) only allow speeds [at TS <4m/s]. However minor improvement was noticed in efficiency or noise frequency. Copyright © 2013 by ASME.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: