Dilemmas in continuing professional learning: learning inscribed in frameworks or elicited from practice

Publisher:
Taylor and Francis
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Studies in Continuing Education, 2015, 37 (2), pp. 131 - 141
Issue Date:
2015-04-02
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
ThumbnailFinalsubmitted121214_Reich+et+al.pdfAccepted Manuscript80.54 kB
Adobe PDF
This paper explores a dilemma in continuing professional learning: the way learning is typically inscribed in continuing professional education (CPE) frameworks differs from that elicited from practice. It examines these differences in relation to both different underlying assumptions about learning and varying epistemological perspectives as well as the different purposes of CPE frameworks of professional bodies and organisations. It suggests that the dominant adoption of narrower conceptions of learning in professional organisations' frameworks ignores understandings about work and learning emerging from recent research in the field of workplace learning and focuses on a view that may privilege formal provision. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research directions in developing alternative continuing professional learning frameworks.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: