A fictional work : The secret cure and a dissertation : a writer looks at creativity and neuroscience
- Publication Type:
- Thesis
- Issue Date:
- 2005
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01Front.pdf | contents and abstract | 224.78 kB | |||
02Whole.pdf | thesis | 11.33 MB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
NO FULL TEXT AVAILABLE. Access is restricted indefinitely. ----- Can a novelist, untrained in science, usefully comment on her own creative
processes if her comments are informed by recent findings in neuroscience and
research and theories of cognitive psychology and the brain? Can one person’s
rigorous self-examination using these findings tell us about a class of experience?
The dissertation examines through work diaries, early drafts of the novel
submitted, The Secret Cure, the novelist’s struggle to harness her imagination during
the novel’s creation. One of her preoccupations is to explain the puzzling but abiding
sense of bliss that accompanies particular moments of creativity, a bliss that causes
her to constantly return to make “a pact with the devil”.
The novelist’s examination is informed by neuroscience and brain imaging,
notably Vilayanur S. Ramachandran’s “peak shift” theory; also by George Christos’
theories about “spurious memories”, Giaccomo Rizzolatti’s “mirror neurons” as well
as by cognitive psychology on insight, in particular Colin Martindale’s work on close
and remote associations, and Kelly’s work on the attaining of a “Creativity Cycle”.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: