A qualitative comparison of two processes for object-oriented software development

Henderson-Sellers, B; Collins, G; Dué, R; Graham, I

A qualitative comparison of two processes for object-oriented software development

Henderson-Sellers, B Collins, G Dué, R Graham, I

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Information and Software Technology, 2001, 43 (12), pp. 705 - 724
Issue Date:: 2001-11-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2004004469.pdf		1.83 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Henderson-Sellers, B	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Collins, G	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Dué, R	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Graham, I	en_US
dc.date.issued	2001-11-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Information and Software Technology, 2001, 43 (12), pp. 705 - 724	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0950-5849	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/4015
dc.description.abstract	Two of the leading object-oriented processes are the public domain Object-oriented Process, Environment and Notation (OPEN) and the proprietary Rational Unified Process (RUP). A qualitative evaluation is performed on RUP's public domain component and on OPEN using a set of stated criteria. In particular, we focus our comparison on aspects of the process architecture and underpinning metamodel, the concepts and terminology utilized and support for project management. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Information and Software Technology	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1016/S0950-5849(01)00180-X	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Software Engineering	en_US
dc.title	A qualitative comparison of two processes for object-oriented software development	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	12	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	43	en_US
utslib.for	080309 Software Engineering	en_US
utslib.for	080608 Information Systems Development Methodologies	en_US
utslib.for	0803 Computer Software	en_US
utslib.for	0806 Information Systems	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Software
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - HCTD - Human Centred Technology Design
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.issue	12	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	43	en_US

Abstract:

Two of the leading object-oriented processes are the public domain Object-oriented Process, Environment and Notation (OPEN) and the proprietary Rational Unified Process (RUP). A qualitative evaluation is performed on RUP's public domain component and on OPEN using a set of stated criteria. In particular, we focus our comparison on aspects of the process architecture and underpinning metamodel, the concepts and terminology utilized and support for project management. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/4015