A conservative oxygenation strategy is feasible and appears to be safe compared with liberal oxygenation in mechanically ventilated patients [commentary]

Ntoumenopoulos, G

Permalink

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

This item is open access.

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Ntoumenopoulos, G https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1088-3009	en_US
dc.date.available	2015-10-31	en_US
dc.date.issued	2016-01-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Physiotherapy, 2016, 62 (1), pp. 51 - ?	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1836-9553	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/41849
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Physiotherapy	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1016/j.jphys.2015.10.005	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Rehabilitation	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Humans	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Oxygen	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Respiration, Artificial	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Oxygen Inhalation Therapy	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Female	en_US
dc.subject.mesh	Male	en_US
dc.title	A conservative oxygenation strategy is feasible and appears to be safe compared with liberal oxygenation in mechanically ventilated patients [commentary]	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	1	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	62	en_US
utslib.for	1103 Clinical Sciences	en_US
utslib.for	1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Graduate School of Health
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.issue	1	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	62	en_US

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: