Browsing byAuthorStreet, D

Jump to: 0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
or enter first few letters:  
Showing results 1 to 20 of 20
Issue DateTitleAuthor(s)
2014-01-01An Australian discrete choice experiment to value EQ-5D health statesViney, R; Norman, R; Brazier, J; Cronin, P; King, MT; Ratcliffe, J; Street, D
2018-02-01Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30King, MT; Viney, R; Simon Pickard, A; Rowen, D; Aaronson, NK; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Costa, DSJ; Fayers, PM; Kemmler, G; McTaggart-Cowen, H; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Peacock, S; Street, DJ; Young, TA; Norman, R; Aaronson, N; Brazier, J; Costa, D; Fayers, P; Grimison, P; Janda, M; King (Chair), M; McTaggart-Cowan, H; Pickard, S; Velikova, G; Street, D; Young, T
2015Complexity and doctor choices when discussing contraceptivesFiebig, D; Viney, RC; Haas, M; Knox, S; Street, D; Weisberg, E; Bateson, D
2006-01Design of choice experiments in health economicsBurgess, LB; Street, D; Viney, RC; Louviere, JJ; Jones, AM
2019Design of Discrete Choice ExperimentsStreet, D; Viney, R
2008-01Designing Discrete Choice Experiments for Health CareStreet, D; Burgess, LB; Viney, RC; Louviere, JJ; Ryan, M; Gerard, K; Amaya-Amaya, M
2008-08-01Designing discrete choice experiments: Do optimal designs come at a price?Louviere, JJ; Islam, T; Wasi, N; Street, D; Burgess, L
2019Developing UK values for cancer health statesNorman, R; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Brazier, JE; Cella, D; Pickard, AS; Rowen, D; Street, D; Viney, R; King, MT
2002-12-01Dissecting the Random Component of UtilityLouviere, J; Street, D; Carson, R; Ainslie, A; Deshazo, JR; Cameron, T; Hensher, D; Kohn, R; Marley, T
2013-06-01Do women and providers value the same features of contraceptive products? Results of a best-worst stated preference experimentWeisberg, E; Bateson, D; Knox, S; Haas, M; Viney, R; Street, D; Fiebig, D
2010-05-01Does mode of administration matter? Comparison of online and face-to-face administration of a time trade-off taskNorman, R; King, MT; Clarke, D; Viney, R; Cronin, P; Street, D
2013-05-01Efficiency and equity: A stated preference approachNorman, R; Hall, J; Street, D; Viney, R
2009-01-01International comparisons in valuing eq-5d health states: A review and analysisNorman, R; Cronin, P; Viney, R; King, M; Street, D; Ratcliffe, J
2019Investigating the relative value of health and social care related quality of life using a discrete choice experimentMulhern, B; Norman, R; De Abreu Lourenco, R; Street, D; Malley, J; Viney, R
2008-04-01Is fast access to general practice all that should matter? A discrete choice experiment of patients' preferencesGerard, K; Salisbury, C; Street, D; Pope, C; Baxter, H
2008-01-01Modeling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference informationLouviere, JJ; Street, D; Burgess, L; Wasi, N; Islam, T; Marley, AAJ
2010-07-01Optimal designs for stated choice experiments that incorporate tiesBush, S; Burgess, L; Street, D
2001-01Resolvable Designs for Resolving DisputesStreet, D; Wilson, WH
2012-02-14Survival gains needed to offset persistent adverse treatment effects in localised prostate cancerKing, MT; Viney, R; Smith, DP; Hossain, I; Street, D; Savage, E; Fowler, S; Berry, MP; Stockler, M; Cozzi, P; Stricker, P; Ward, J; Armstrong, BK
2012-01What's good and bad about contraceptive products? A best-worst attribute experiment comparing the values of women consumers and GPsKnox, SA; Viney, RC; Street, D; Haas, MR; Fiebig, DG; Weisberg, E; Bateson, D