Superannuation Complaints Tribunal and the public / private distinction in Australian administrative law

Lawbook Co
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Australian Journal of Administrative Law, 2006, 13 (3), pp. 147 - 163
Issue Date:
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2008003458OK.pdf352.63 kB
Adobe PDF
This article considers the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) and the capacity of its decisions to be reviewed. While the constitutional position of the SCT is settled after the decision of the High Court in Attorney-General (Cth) v Breckler (1999) 197 CLR 83, its categorisation as a private body remains open to question. This being the case, the susceptibility of decisions of the SCT to review is compared with the equitable standards upon which trustee decisions are reviewable. Challenges to decisions of the SCT may not be possible under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) but the quasiprivate character of the SCT a private body with a public function presents scope for courts to hold that the SCT owes an equitable duty to those within its jurisdiction.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: