The Ring of Truth: A Case Study of Credibility Assessment in Particular Social Group Refugee Determinations

Oxford University Press
Publication Type:
Journal Article
International Journal of Refugee Law, 2009, 21 (1), pp. 1 - 33
Issue Date:
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2008000425.pdf878.02 kB
Adobe PDF
Credibility assessment has always been a major issue in refugee determinations and its importance increases in the context of widespread introduction of âfast-trackâ processes and the manifest trans-national trend to truncate (or indeed remove) avenues for review. This article explores the practice of credibility assessment in lower level tribunals using a case study of over 1000 particular social group ground (PSG) decisions made on the basis of sexual orientation over the past 15 years. Credibility played an increasingly major role in claim refusals, and negative credibility assessments were not always based on well-reasoned or defensible grounds. The article uses this specific case study in order to ground recommendations for structural and institutional change aimed at improving the credibility assessment process in refugee determinations more broadly.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: