Probing for loss: The case against probe trains

Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
IEEE Communications Letters, 2011, 15 (5), pp. 590 - 592
Issue Date:
2011-05-01
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
05738312.pdfPublished Version260.87 kB
Adobe PDF
We assess the bias and variance of active probing measurement techniques for loss in networks. We show that loss probability is best measured using isolated probes rather than with probe 'trains', which contrasts with prior work which found that probe trains better estimate statistics of lossy periods. © 2006 IEEE.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: