The State of the Judicature: A Statistical Profile of Australian Courts and Judges

Publisher:
Sydney Law School
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Sydney Law Review, 2013, 35 (489), pp. 489 - 517
Issue Date:
2013
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
(2013) Opeskin - State of Judicature (FINAL).pdfPublished Version512.69 kB
Adobe PDF
In 1977 Chief Justice Barwick gave one of the first statistical snapshots of the Australian courts as a ‘judicial system’ in his inaugural ‘State of the Australian Judicature’ address. Since then, there has been no detailed statistical examination of the characteristics of the Australian judicature, due in part to the paucity of reliable data. After the passage of 36 years, this article provides a second examination of Australian courts and judges using data from the Productivity Commission and other sources. The article describes and analyses key attributes and observable trends in the judicature from the perspectives of both the supply side (judicial labour) and the demand side (court lodgements). This is done across six domains: size and growth; tiers of the court hierarchy; state versus federal systems; civil versus criminal subject matter; regional dynamics; and gender composition. What emerges is a complex picture of a dynamic judicial system that does not always comport with common assumptions about its structure and organisation. There is a critical need for the collection of additional data on the judicature, and for research that provides a better understanding of the forces that will shape the evolution of the Australian judicial system over the coming decades.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: