Freespace: Campus hopping: Serial Teaching in Sydney.

Donnelly, S

Freespace: Campus hopping: Serial Teaching in Sydney.

Donnelly, S

Permalink

Publisher:: aae: association of architectural educators.
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Charrette, 2016, 3(2), 3 (2), pp. 112 - 122 (11)
Issue Date:: 2016-02-18

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Accepted Manuscript VersionAdobe PDF (3.26 MB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Donnelly, S https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8558-8285	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Barton, G	en_US
dc.date.available	2016-02-18	en_US
dc.date.issued	2016-02-18	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Charrette, 2016, 3(2), 3 (2), pp. 112 - 122 (11)	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	2054-6718	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/117818
dc.description.abstract	This paper explores the role of the design studio tutor in three first-year architectural design studio courses that currently exist in the inner suburbs of Sydney, Australia. This is based on the experience of a casual academic who has taught concurrently in all 3 courses in these institutions for over 10 years. It investigates the curriculum structures which drive each of the three studio settings and questions the role of the transient teacher in the maintenance of each university’s respective reputation and the studio outcomes. It also reveals unspoken rules and expectations, which casual academics take on with each contract, and how these affect learning outcomes in the studio. By examining the curricula of each course, this paper questions whether transient teaching can positively enhance the education of architecture students who are physically so close, yet apparently distant in terms of methodology.	en_US
dc.format	2054-6718	en_US
dc.language	-	en_US
dc.publisher	aae: association of architectural educators.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Charrette	en_US
dc.title	Freespace: Campus hopping: Serial Teaching in Sydney.	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	2	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	3	en_US
utslib.location.activity	UK	en_US
utslib.citation.edition	3(2)	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building/School of Architecture
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.edition	3(2)	en_US
pubs.issue	2	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published online	en_US
pubs.volume	3	en_US

Abstract:

This paper explores the role of the design studio tutor in three first-year architectural design studio courses that currently exist in the inner suburbs of Sydney, Australia. This is based on the experience of a casual academic who has taught concurrently in all 3 courses in these institutions for over 10 years. It investigates the curriculum structures which drive each of the three studio settings and questions the role of the transient teacher in the maintenance of each university’s respective reputation and the studio outcomes. It also reveals unspoken rules and expectations, which casual academics take on with each contract, and how these affect learning outcomes in the studio. By examining the curricula of each course, this paper questions whether transient teaching can positively enhance the education of architecture students who are physically so close, yet apparently distant in terms of methodology.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/117818