Empirical Evidence in Software Architecture: A Systematic Literature Review Protocol

Qureshi, N; Ikram, N; Bano, M; Usman, M

Empirical Evidence in Software Architecture: A Systematic Literature Review Protocol

Qureshi, N Ikram, N Bano, M

Usman, M

Permalink

Publisher:: IARIA
Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2011) - Proceedings, 2011
Issue Date:: 2011-10-23

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	93aeef46bb9ca1b004c5a4eb2bad4310d07c.pdf	Published version	196.46 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Qureshi, N	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Ikram, N	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Bano, M https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1447-9521	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Usman, M	en_US
dc.date	2011-10-23	en_US
dc.date.issued	2011-10-23	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2011) - Proceedings, 2011	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	978-1-61208-165-6	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/119658
dc.description.abstract	Software Architecture (SA) plays important role in software development as it acts as a skeleton and the whole development revolves around it. As the SA as a discipline is maturing, large number of empirically supported studies are being reported in SA. There is a need to systematically aggregate, analyze and synthesize evidence based studies in SA. We plan to systematically investigate evidence-based SA studies to see and report state of the art in evidence based SA reported research. This paper aims at providing a brief description of systematic literature review (SLR) protocol to describe a process for synthesizing the empirically supported work in the area of SA. Protocol for this review has already been developed and its implementation is in progress. Expected outcome of this review will be state-of-the-art of empirical work in the field of software architecture, strength and effectiveness of empirical work, best practices and future research directions.	en_US
dc.publisher	IARIA	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2011) - Proceedings	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	International Conference on Software Engineering Advances	en_US
dc.title	Empirical Evidence in Software Architecture: A Systematic Literature Review Protocol	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.location.activity	Barcelona, Spain	en_US
utslib.for	0803 Computer Software	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences/FASS Faculty Administration
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	false	en_US
pubs.finish-date	2011-10-29	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.start-date	2011-10-23	en_US

Abstract:

Software Architecture (SA) plays important role in software development as it acts as a skeleton and the whole development revolves around it. As the SA as a discipline is maturing, large number of empirically supported studies are being reported in SA. There is a need to systematically aggregate, analyze and synthesize evidence based studies in SA. We plan to systematically investigate evidence-based SA studies to see and report state of the art in evidence based SA reported research. This paper aims at providing a brief description of systematic literature review (SLR) protocol to describe a process for synthesizing the empirically supported work in the area of SA. Protocol for this review has already been developed and its implementation is in progress. Expected outcome of this review will be state-of-the-art of empirical work in the field of software architecture, strength and effectiveness of empirical work, best practices and future research directions.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/119658