Evaluating usage of WSMO and OWL-S in semantic web services

Kamaruddin, LA; Shen, J; Beydoun, G

Evaluating usage of WSMO and OWL-S in semantic web services

Kamaruddin, LA Shen, J

Beydoun, G

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series, 2012, 130 pp. 53 - 58
Issue Date:: 2012-07-12

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	eva.pdf	Published version	626.3 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Kamaruddin, LA	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Shen, J https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9403-7140	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Beydoun, G https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8087-5445	en_US
dc.date.issued	2012-07-12	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series, 2012, 130 pp. 53 - 58	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9781921770111	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1445-1336	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/121284
dc.description.abstract	Applying ontologies is the most promising approach to semantically enrich Web services. To facilitate this, two efforts contributed the most in enabling the creation of ontologies: OWL-S from the US and WSMO in Europe. These two compete and promote their ontologies from the design perspective, reflecting their inventors' bias but not offering much help to Web service developers using them. To bypass existing biases and enable evaluation of ontologies expressed in these two languages, this paper provides a study of the two important facilitators, OWL-S and WSMO, surveying their usage in several SWS Projects and identifying their respective and outstanding gaps. The paper then proposes a set of evaluation criteria for usage measurement on the two prominent SWS ontologies. © 2012, Australian Computer Society, Inc.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series	en_US
dc.title	Evaluating usage of WSMO and OWL-S in semantic web services	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.citation.volume	130	en_US
utslib.for	0806 Information Systems	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Information, Systems and Modelling
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CAMGIS - Centre for Advanced Modelling and Geospatial lnformation Systems
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - PERSWADE - Centre on Persuasive Systems for Wise Adaptive Living
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	130	en_US

Abstract:

Applying ontologies is the most promising approach to semantically enrich Web services. To facilitate this, two efforts contributed the most in enabling the creation of ontologies: OWL-S from the US and WSMO in Europe. These two compete and promote their ontologies from the design perspective, reflecting their inventors' bias but not offering much help to Web service developers using them. To bypass existing biases and enable evaluation of ontologies expressed in these two languages, this paper provides a study of the two important facilitators, OWL-S and WSMO, surveying their usage in several SWS Projects and identifying their respective and outstanding gaps. The paper then proposes a set of evaluation criteria for usage measurement on the two prominent SWS ontologies. © 2012, Australian Computer Society, Inc.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/121284