Standards-based metamodel for the management of goals, risks and evidences in critical systems development

Larrucea, X; Gonzalez-Perez, C; McBride, T

Standards-based metamodel for the management of goals, risks and evidences in critical systems development

Larrucea, X Gonzalez-Perez, C McBride, T

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Computer Standards and Interfaces, 2016, 48 pp. 71 - 79
Issue Date:: 2016-11-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	1-s2.0-S0920548916300319-main.pdf	Published Version	718.59 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Larrucea, X	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Gonzalez-Perez, C	en_US
dc.contributor.author	McBride, T https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9038-7952	en_US
dc.date.issued	2016-11-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Computer Standards and Interfaces, 2016, 48 pp. 71 - 79	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0920-5489	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/122739
dc.description.abstract	© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Safety critical system development includes a wide set of techniques, methods and tools for assuring system safety. The concept of evidence is one of the key notions used to provide safety confidence to stakeholders. Safety goals must be identified during safety analysis. In addition, risks should also be considered and managed, and linked to the achievement of safety goals. This paper proposes an extension of the ISO/IEC 24744 metamodel for development methodologies in order to integrate the management of goals, risks and evidence into system development lifecycles in an ISO/IEC 15026-compliant manner that is related to the approach of assurance cases. The proposed extension is illustrated through a real-life scenario in the automotive domain where the system being developed must comply with ISO 26262, a standard in this domain. By using the proposed approach, the management of goals, risks and evidence in critical systems development is formalized and harmonized with different ISO/IEC standards, resulting in a more robust and systematic treatment of these crucial aspects.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Computer Standards and Interfaces	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1016/j.csi.2016.04.004	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Information Systems	en_US
dc.title	Standards-based metamodel for the management of goals, risks and evidences in critical systems development	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	48	en_US
utslib.for	0803 Computer Software	en_US
utslib.for	0804 Data Format	en_US
utslib.for	0805 Distributed Computing	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Software
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - HCTD - Human Centred Technology Design
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	48	en_US

Abstract:

© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Safety critical system development includes a wide set of techniques, methods and tools for assuring system safety. The concept of evidence is one of the key notions used to provide safety confidence to stakeholders. Safety goals must be identified during safety analysis. In addition, risks should also be considered and managed, and linked to the achievement of safety goals. This paper proposes an extension of the ISO/IEC 24744 metamodel for development methodologies in order to integrate the management of goals, risks and evidence into system development lifecycles in an ISO/IEC 15026-compliant manner that is related to the approach of assurance cases. The proposed extension is illustrated through a real-life scenario in the automotive domain where the system being developed must comply with ISO 26262, a standard in this domain. By using the proposed approach, the management of goals, risks and evidence in critical systems development is formalized and harmonized with different ISO/IEC standards, resulting in a more robust and systematic treatment of these crucial aspects.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/122739