New approaches to growth planning on larger-than-local scales

Pugalis, L; Townsend, A; Gray, N; Ankowska, A

New approaches to growth planning on larger-than-local scales

Pugalis, L

Townsend, A Gray, N Ankowska, A

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 2016, 10 (1), pp. 73 - 88
Issue Date:: 2016-01-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	5.pdf	Published Version	9.33 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Pugalis, L https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8987-6356	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Townsend, A	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Gray, N	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Ankowska, A	en_US
dc.date.issued	2016-01-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 2016, 10 (1), pp. 73 - 88	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1752-9638	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/122833
dc.description.abstract	© 2016 Henry Stewart Publications. All rights reserved. Approaches to growth planning and spatial governance on larger-than-local scales are matters of entrenched contention. Following the annulment of regionalised patterns of working and policy coordination across England during the early 2010s, much of the country was left without suitable larger-than-local scales of spatial governance and planning arrangements for delivering growth ambitions. This paper analyses the emergence of new approaches to planning for growth that have arisen on larger-thanlocal scales since the abandonment of regionalised policy working. Specifically, the nature and capabilities of strategic economic plans are examined, derived from a national comparative analysis of all of them. The findings draw attention to some of the defining challenges of informal growth planning on larger-than-local scales, as the research considers the extent to which these plans address an apparent strategic void. A key distinction is drawn between plans resembling bidding documents and those that could be considered to be plans for the area. In doing so, the intent is that the research contributes new knowledge to the evolving practice of strategic planning and economic strategy.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal	en_US
dc.title	New approaches to growth planning on larger-than-local scales	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	1	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	10	en_US
utslib.for	1205 Urban and Regional Planning	en_US
utslib.for	1605 Policy and Administration	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Research)
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Research)/lnstitute for Public Policy and Governance
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - IPPG - Institute for Public Policy and Governance
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.issue	1	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	10	en_US

Abstract:

© 2016 Henry Stewart Publications. All rights reserved. Approaches to growth planning and spatial governance on larger-than-local scales are matters of entrenched contention. Following the annulment of regionalised patterns of working and policy coordination across England during the early 2010s, much of the country was left without suitable larger-than-local scales of spatial governance and planning arrangements for delivering growth ambitions. This paper analyses the emergence of new approaches to planning for growth that have arisen on larger-thanlocal scales since the abandonment of regionalised policy working. Specifically, the nature and capabilities of strategic economic plans are examined, derived from a national comparative analysis of all of them. The findings draw attention to some of the defining challenges of informal growth planning on larger-than-local scales, as the research considers the extent to which these plans address an apparent strategic void. A key distinction is drawn between plans resembling bidding documents and those that could be considered to be plans for the area. In doing so, the intent is that the research contributes new knowledge to the evolving practice of strategic planning and economic strategy.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/122833