Ressentiment in Australian policy debate

Sinclair, M; Smith, R

Ressentiment in Australian policy debate

Sinclair, M

Smith, R

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 2014, 1 (3)
Issue Date:: 2014-05-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	Sinclair_and_Smith_Oz_Policy_Debate.pdf	Published Version	305.71 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Sinclair, M https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7928-2431	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Smith, R	en_US
dc.date.issued	2014-05-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 2014, 1 (3)	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	2201-1315	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/123105
dc.description.abstract	This paper argues Australian policy debate is characterised by an unwarranted sense of dissatisfaction and grievance. The argument is illustrated with reference to key policy issues under debate in Australia at present. The concept of 'ressentiment' is used to show how the trend of focusing on perceptions of wrong and injury among policy protagonists may preclude crucial constraints from future policy discussion.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change	en_US
dc.title	Ressentiment in Australian policy debate	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	3	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	1	en_US
utslib.for	1303 Specialist Studies in Education	en_US
utslib.for	1301 Education Systems	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.issue	3	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	1	en_US

Abstract:

This paper argues Australian policy debate is characterised by an unwarranted sense of dissatisfaction and grievance. The argument is illustrated with reference to key policy issues under debate in Australia at present. The concept of 'ressentiment' is used to show how the trend of focusing on perceptions of wrong and injury among policy protagonists may preclude crucial constraints from future policy discussion.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/123105