Intellectual Property Rights: A Western Tale

Roy, A

Intellectual Property Rights: A Western Tale

Roy, A

Permalink

Publisher:: City University of Hong Kong
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Asia Pacific Law Review, 2008, 16 (2), pp. 219 - 239
Issue Date:: 2008-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2007003406OK.pdf		45.28 kB		View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Roy, A	en_US
dc.date.issued	2008-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Asia Pacific Law Review, 2008, 16 (2), pp. 219 - 239	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1019-2557	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12601
dc.description.abstract	Even today, when the development and expansion of intellectual property protections is justified or criticised, the Western philosophical tradition is generally evoked. Appeals to natural rights, Lockean labour theories of property and Kantian or Hegelian theories of personality abound. Alternatively, economic principles and utilitarian rationales are drawn upon to rationalise or question intellectual property laws as incentive structures that produce a socially optimal supply of intellectual creations. In both these moral and utilitarian arguments, scholars address intellectual property laws purely abstractly, as promoting reified rights in unremarkable and indistinguishable intangibles.	en_US
dc.publisher	City University of Hong Kong	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Asia Pacific Law Review	en_US
dc.title	Intellectual Property Rights: A Western Tale	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	2	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	16	en_US
utslib.for	1801 Law	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Law
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.issue	2	en_US
pubs.volume	16	en_US

Abstract:

Even today, when the development and expansion of intellectual property protections is justified or criticised, the Western philosophical tradition is generally evoked. Appeals to natural rights, Lockean labour theories of property and Kantian or Hegelian theories of personality abound. Alternatively, economic principles and utilitarian rationales are drawn upon to rationalise or question intellectual property laws as incentive structures that produce a socially optimal supply of intellectual creations. In both these moral and utilitarian arguments, scholars address intellectual property laws purely abstractly, as promoting reified rights in unremarkable and indistinguishable intangibles.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12601