Some theoretical results on the relationship between argumentation and coherence theory

Publication Type:
Conference Proceeding
Citation:
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2017, 10207 LNAI pp. 565 - 579
Issue Date:
2017-01-01
Metrics:
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Moraitis-AT16.pdfAccepted Manuscript308.48 kB
Adobe PDF
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017. This work provides initial results on the relationship between argumentation and Paul Thagard’s coherence theory. We study the relationship, via appropriate transformations, between different types of coherent graphs (according to the values in the arcs) and different argumentation frameworks such as Dung’s abstract argumentation framework, weighted argument systems or preference-based argumentation. The practical interest of our study is to show that coherence theory and argumentation can be mutually useful.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: