Some theoretical results on the relationship between argumentation and coherence theory

Dimopoulos, Y; Moraitis, P; Sierra, C

Some theoretical results on the relationship between argumentation and coherence theory

Dimopoulos, Y Moraitis, P Sierra, C

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2017, 10207 LNAI pp. 565 - 579
Issue Date:: 2017-01-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Accepted ManuscriptAdobe PDF (308.48 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Dimopoulos, Y	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Moraitis, P	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Sierra, C https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0839-6233	en_US
dc.date.issued	2017-01-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2017, 10207 LNAI pp. 565 - 579	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9783319592930	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0302-9743	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/127532
dc.description.abstract	© Springer International Publishing AG 2017. This work provides initial results on the relationship between argumentation and Paul Thagard’s coherence theory. We study the relationship, via appropriate transformations, between different types of coherent graphs (according to the values in the arcs) and different argumentation frameworks such as Dung’s abstract argumentation framework, weighted argument systems or preference-based argumentation. The practical interest of our study is to show that coherence theory and argumentation can be mutually useful.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1007/978-3-319-59294-7_45	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Artificial Intelligence & Image Processing	en_US
dc.title	Some theoretical results on the relationship between argumentation and coherence theory	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.citation.volume	10207 LNAI	en_US
utslib.for	0806 Information Systems	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Software
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	10207 LNAI	en_US

Abstract:

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017. This work provides initial results on the relationship between argumentation and Paul Thagard’s coherence theory. We study the relationship, via appropriate transformations, between different types of coherent graphs (according to the values in the arcs) and different argumentation frameworks such as Dung’s abstract argumentation framework, weighted argument systems or preference-based argumentation. The practical interest of our study is to show that coherence theory and argumentation can be mutually useful.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/127532