Design Knowledge Development and Additive Manufacturing Systems: How Does Design Knowledge Change With Design for AM?

Walden, R; Lie, S

Design Knowledge Development and Additive Manufacturing Systems: How Does Design Knowledge Change With Design for AM?

Walden, R

Lie, S

Permalink

Publisher:: IGI Global
Publication Type:: Chapter
Citation:: Handbook of Research on Industrial Advancement in Scientific Knowledge, 2019, pp. 205 - 222
Issue Date:: 2019

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	Design knowledge development and additive manufacturing systems am.pdf	Accepted Manuscript	687.18 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Walden, R https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8746-7276	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Lie, S https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3512-2185	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Gonzáles-Prida Diaz, V	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Zamora Bonilla, JP	en_US
dc.date.issued	2019	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Handbook of Research on Industrial Advancement in Scientific Knowledge, 2019, pp. 205 - 222	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9781522571520	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/131044
dc.description.abstract	The adoption of new technology is key for any manufacturer wanting to stay relevant as the world transi- tions to Industry 4.0. The advance of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies—an important element of Industry 4.0—has become part of a globally accepted reality. However, conventional design practice and knowledge generation inside a manufacturing firm must evolve. Technology-driven innovation must embrace knowledge-directed design work that is aimed at forecasting and utilizing the potential of new technologies. The chapter includes two projects, both of which were manufactured using additive manufacturing laser sintering technology. Analysis of the projects positions them at either end of a wider spectrum of product design practice that more aptly captures the way design and industry must operate for technology-driven innovation and Industry 4.0. A place for conventional design for manufacture remains though the case studies indicate differences in the setting of values to inform practice, requiring new methods for creating and managing design knowledge in the future.	en_US
dc.publisher	IGI Global	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Handbook of Research on Industrial Advancement in Scientific Knowledge	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	IGI Global Book Series: Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology (AHSAT)	en_US
dc.title	Design Knowledge Development and Additive Manufacturing Systems: How Does Design Knowledge Change With Design for AM?	en_US
dc.type	Chapter
utslib.location	US	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building/School of Design
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.place-of-publication	US	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US

Abstract:

The adoption of new technology is key for any manufacturer wanting to stay relevant as the world transi- tions to Industry 4.0. The advance of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies—an important element of Industry 4.0—has become part of a globally accepted reality. However, conventional design practice and knowledge generation inside a manufacturing firm must evolve. Technology-driven innovation must embrace knowledge-directed design work that is aimed at forecasting and utilizing the potential of new technologies. The chapter includes two projects, both of which were manufactured using additive manufacturing laser sintering technology. Analysis of the projects positions them at either end of a wider spectrum of product design practice that more aptly captures the way design and industry must operate for technology-driven innovation and Industry 4.0. A place for conventional design for manufacture remains though the case studies indicate differences in the setting of values to inform practice, requiring new methods for creating and managing design knowledge in the future.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/130056